My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2015 09 23
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2015 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2015 09 23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:19 PM
Creation date
10/12/2015 9:06:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2015 09 23
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 17, 2015 <br />Page 4 of 11 <br />Fahey stated her biggest concern is the plan doesn't start until page 35 and is <br />only 8 pages. She wasn't sure if we needed all of the previous information <br />provided in the previous 35 pages. <br />Trice stated it was discussed by staff and the information in the first 35 pages are <br />the history of the city and the preservation program. She stated there might be a <br />way to adjust the order. <br />Fahey stated that would be a good consideration. <br />Watson agreed. <br />Stewart stated he disagreed and believes they need to stay upfront to give the <br />background of the plan. Context usually goes first and the plan is always at the <br />end. <br />Fahey stated this plan is 47 pages long and the comp plan is 55 pages long. <br />She did not see the necessity for this plan to be this long. <br />Fasick stated she agrees with Stewart. She believes the stuff in the beginning is <br />great reading. <br />Watson stated this is a format question that we can continue to discuss. He said <br />we might be able to have a strong executive summary in the front and move the <br />rest to the back of the document. Most people only read the executive summary. <br />Haley stated she likes the history and the photos. She said you can minimize the <br />photos to cut back photos. <br />Fahey stated she agrees with the information but doesn't believe we need to <br />provide the process of how the plan was created up front. That can be placed in <br />the back. <br />Haley stated she believes it needs to remain sequentially. <br />Trice started discussing the action items beginning with Year 1 items. <br />Fahey stated she didn't understand why the practice, policy and perception items <br />don't sync. They should be grouped together better. <br />Discussion ensued regarding how modifications are made in Chapter 15. <br />Stewart asked about the voluntary historic district statement. He would rather it <br />say evaluate and not be a directive. <br />Trice stated it is stronger because that is what our ordinance currently states and <br />the importance of how the program must remain voluntary. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.