My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 10 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2015 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 10 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:08:09 PM
Creation date
10/12/2015 9:45:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7A5
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2015 10 06
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
439
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 15, 2015 <br />Page 14 of 19 <br />Economic Development Director DeJong reviewed the Seventh Amendment to Sales <br />Agreement: 1) Delays the $200,000 purchase price to be paid at the second closing for <br />transferring Lot 3 (former Napa building and currently TILT Pinball) after the stabilization <br />scope of work is complete. 2) Increases the earnest money deposit to $20,000 at the <br />first closing to transfer the Grain Elevator parcel and Outlot A. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />Erik Hartronft stated they always assumed they would have to pay the full purchase <br />price when they received title to the property. The city attorney advised them they must <br />pay the full purchase price before taking possession of the property. It was their <br />understanding the earnest money served as their investment until the stabilization was <br />done. They supported the resolution approving the seventh amendment to the contract. <br />Mayor Muckle asked for clarification on the closing and transfer of the property. <br />Economic Development Director DeJong explained the intent was for the applicant to do <br />the work on the stabilization before the closing of the property. <br />City Attorney Light explained two years ago there were different scenarios reviewed <br />relative to the closing. The contract does have imbedded the scenario there could be <br />one closing, but it also provided closing on the grain elevator with title for the Lot 3 <br />being held until the stabilization was complete. The grain elevator could take a tenant <br />and be put to use while the stabilization work was completed. He was not concerned <br />with revising the contract to allow a joint single closing. If the applicant cannot complete <br />the work by the end of October, it would move the closing to November. Under the <br />present scenario, the applicant could record the Plat, PUD and landmark the property. <br />The second closing requires the City Manager to confirm the stabilization is done and <br />accepted before the delivery of the deeds and payment of the purchase price. <br />Erik Hartronft explained the goal is to have the stabilization done in order to close on the <br />property. One reason they accept the split closing is to close on the property and move <br />forward with the renovations on the east side of the grain elevator. <br />City Attorney Light stated the contract contemplates the approvals will be in place, but <br />they won't be recorded until the initial closing. He stated language could be added to <br />the Seventh Amendment to have a mutual agreement upon the trigger point for the <br />recording of the Plat and PUD in advance the closing of any conveyance and the <br />landmarking resolution has to be put into the record at the time the lot is created. <br />Erik Hartronft stated they are fine with the proposed amendments to the agreement. He <br />stated they do not expect any special treatment. <br />MOTION: Mayor Muckle moved to approve Resolution No. 64, Series 2015, seconded <br />by Council member Loo. Roll call vote was taken. The motion carried by a vote of 7 -0. <br />32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.