My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 10 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2015 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 10 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:08:09 PM
Creation date
10/12/2015 9:45:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7A5
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2015 10 06
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
439
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 15, 2015 <br />Page 16 of 19 <br />Lake Pump Station, which experience peaking factors that escalate average monthly bill <br />costs. These credits could also be transferred to meters at the Golf Course and new <br />Wastewater Treatment Plant sometime in the future if these locations prove to have <br />higher peaking factors. Staff performed preliminary validation of the data and <br />calculations presented by Clean Energy Collective. <br />New Clean Energy Collective Solar Lease Purchase for Consideration: The proposed <br />lease considers a slightly different lease purchase with Alpine Bank for solar panels <br />again supplied by Clean Energy Collective. This new lease purchase of 198,555 watts <br />of solar capacity would be at an interest rate of 5.25% for years 1 -5 and then 3.75% for <br />years 4 -15. The total estimated lease payments are $964,499. The total estimated <br />positive cash flow for this lease, based on $1,116,786 in bill credits and $349,276 in <br />Renewable Energy Credits, is $1,466,062. Thus, over a 20 -year life cycle this lease <br />purchase agreement would reduce the City's projected cost for electricity by an <br />additional $501,563. <br />Other Considerations: Clean Energy Collective (CEC) states this is the last opportunity <br />to invest in Community Solar Gardens through Xcel programs that will provide positive <br />net cash flow fairly quickly through Renewable Energy Credits and on -bill credits. <br />Because CEC expects Xcel to change the credit structure, future Community Solar <br />Gardens may not provide net positive cash flows. This proposal would provide for <br />9,578,546 Ibs of avoided CO2 emissions over the 20 year financial analysis. This <br />equates to roughly 10,861,097 miles driven or 14,773 trees planted. <br />Fiscal Impact: Over a 20 -year life, this lease purchase agreement would result in total <br />lease payments of $964,499, fully offset by $1,116,786 in bill credits and $349,276 in <br />Renewable Energy Credits, and thus reduce the City's projected net cost for electricity <br />by a total of $501,563. The higher interest rate in the early years of the agreement, the <br />current proposal, assuming all estimates and factors hold true, would increase the City's <br />net cost of electricity for years 1 -5 by $11,374 to $5,420 dollars each year. The <br />proposed lease payments equal $4.85 per watt for a total of 198,555 watts. It requires <br />$67,502.70 refundable deposit, 15 year lease to own financing. <br />Amy Thompson, Clean Energy Collective, explained there will be two dramatic changes <br />in community solar especially with Xcel Energy. Future arrays will not have any renewal <br />energy certificate payment (REC) and the investment tax credit (ITC) provided by the <br />Federal Government will stop at the end of 2016 (the current ITC is a 30% discount). <br />They were awarded 12 mega -watts with a negative REC kilowatt, which means there is <br />an opportunity to have the golf course on board. The tax rate structure from Boulder I <br />to Boulder II is different so there is not a collateralization of the actual panels for Alpine <br />Bank on the second financing, there for the interest rate increased. She expressed her <br />hope the City Council would take advantage of this opportunity for this array. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.