My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 11 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2015 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 11 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2022 10:48:27 AM
Creation date
11/9/2015 8:45:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7A6
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2015 11 02
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
401
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 13, 2015 <br />Page 11 of 18 <br />Council member Loo asked if the Street Faire was trademarked. Mr. Tienken answered <br />it was. Council member Loo noted Street Faire as a brand was successful and if the <br />City wants to partner, resist the temptation to micro - manage. If it can't continue to be <br />done correctly and well, don't do it at all. <br />Council member Lipton agreed with Council member Loo; Street Faire has a unique <br />brand and energy and must continue to be done well. He suggested earmarking <br />$130,000 in the budget for 2016 for Street Faire. <br />Mr. Tienken noted one of the assumptions of previous numbers, the $20,000 received <br />from the City was included, so would make the number closer to $150,000. The cost of <br />a staff person is unknown. DBA does not want to book bands appearing all across the <br />metro area. Street Faire was begun to get people to come downtown and not as a profit <br />generating idea. As businesses grew downtown, so did the revenue and effort needed <br />to provide the Street Faire, lights and flowers. <br />Council member Stolzmann wanted more detail and formalized presentation when <br />special events are discussed at the next Council meeting. She wondered if flowers <br />could perhaps be done internally. She liked the lights but thought the purchasing policy <br />should be followed. She did not see the dollar figure Council member Lipton had <br />mentioned. <br />Mayor Muckle asked staff to come back with numbers and details for a partnership with <br />the DBA and producing the Street Faire. <br />Economic Director Dejong said the proposal would be $50,000 for flowers and lights in <br />2016, a difference of $30,000 from the 2015 budget and an additional $100,000 for the <br />partnership of the Street Faire for 2016. More information will be available at the next <br />meeting. <br />Fiscal Policies <br />Mayor Muckle inquired if Council was comfortable with the discussion on the Fiscal <br />Policy coming back after Finance Committee <br />Council member Loo stated her understanding there would be payment of monies from <br />other funds to the Combined Utility Fund for the water Parks and Recreation uses. City <br />Manager Fleming remarked that was correct, the percentage has been ramped up in <br />the proposed budget for 2016 to 75 %. <br />Fund Balances <br />Mayor Muckle noted Council member Lipton had expressed a desire for the reserves to <br />grow to above 20% and felt the graph in the packet showed for the next couple of years <br />this was true. <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.