My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 11 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2015 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2015 11 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2022 10:48:27 AM
Creation date
11/9/2015 8:45:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7A6
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2015 11 02
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
401
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 13, 2015 <br />Page 12 of 18 <br />Council member Keany asked for Council member Lipton to comment on the <br />percentage. <br />City Manager Fleming noted the graph being considered shows the percentage of what <br />has been reflected in the General Fund forecast. Projected reserve at the end of 2016 <br />is 31.4% and at the end of 2020 back to 22% and goes as high as 33% in 2017 in terms <br />of operational expenditures the reserve represents. <br />Council member Lipton asked if this was dependent on how much was spent in the <br />Capital Fund. <br />City Manager Fleming noted this is the General Fund, but could depend somewhat on <br />transfers to the Open Space and Parks Fund and to the Capital Projects Fund if <br />necessary. <br />Mayor Muckle noted the graph might bend down by transfers from this fund to Capital <br />Projects based on the earlier conversation about streets. <br />Council member Lipton appreciated the scale showing increased percentage. Trying to <br />reconcile what he saw before and now. He was hoping to get to 23 % -25% in reserves <br />in future years. <br />Mayor Muckle supported growing reserves, was not sure he could support growing <br />beyond 20% next year, but could depend on projects such as the paving. <br />Mayor Muckle suggested moving on to discussing the reserves in the Open Space & <br />Parks Fund and whether to withhold money out of the Open Space & Parks Fund and <br />put it in the General Fund giving more flexibility. He was not in favor of doing so. <br />Council member Stolzmann was under the impression the decision had been made to <br />take the City Manager's recommendation until meetings in December when this will be <br />redone. <br />Mayor Muckle asked if Council agreed to include this in the fiscal policy discussion in <br />December. Council concurred. <br />Weed Control <br />Mayor Muckle noted staff had a new recommendation to contract weed control. <br />Council member Stolzmann wondered if this was just the Weed Coordinator revisited <br />and what level of weed control could be expected next year with the budget proposal. <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.