City Council Minutes 1993 04 14 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

first paragraph of Section L on drainage, with the stipulation that Louisville participate fully in the first year. Roll call was taken. Motion passed by a 4 - 2 vote, with Hornbostel and Davidson voting against. Mayer explained that his basic intent was to give this agreement the best chance for passage. He felt most of the offensive drainage language had been removed. The drainage language that is especially of interest to the County is still in there, which is the one that affects the northwest corner. Hornbostel: Davidson: The reason I voted "no" on all of them is I believe the probability that they are even going to consider it is nil. I want to be able to say that we participate in it. If we go in and · say we ' 11 do this without .... only with this stipulation, then they just turn around and do what they want to do and I want to participate. As a further explanation, Louisville City Council several months ago passed Ordinance No 1082, which is a financial control ordinance. What that financial control ordinance does, and we passed it before I had even heard any details of Amendment No. 1, what it prevents the City of Louisville doing is from entering into lease purchase agreements or agreements like lease purchase. Although this agreement had Louisville participate on a yearly basis, it's probably not covered by that, and I think the Council felt that it violated the spirit of that ordinance. I think we're fully committed not getting the City into multi-year financial obligations, unless there is a vote. Annette Brand, City Administrator, reminded Council that they needed to address the boundaries and whether Council accepts the boundaries, as presented by the City Attorney at this meeting on Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4. Davidson: I really think, as far as we're concerned, the exact boundaries of 2 or 3 don't really mean much. We're 8