Laserfiche WebLink
Davidson called for any further Council discussion. <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />It appears that Storck Development <br />represents his Lot 85. I'm curious <br />as to why they are not present here <br />tonight. <br /> <br />Bill Ebert, 188 Cherrywood Lane, Louisville, owner of Lot 1, stated <br />that he included that property when he wanted to do this request. <br />He asked Storck if he wanted to go in on it and Storck's reaction <br />was that it was Ebert's lot. Ebert felt that whoever would buy <br />that lot would want to have that property out there, too. Also, <br />that it would create a balanced entrance. <br /> <br />Susan Griffiths, City Attorney. <br /> <br />Griffiths: <br /> <br />For clarification, I understand the <br />motion would include the conditions <br />that were applied by the Planning <br />Commission? <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />Mayer accepted that. <br />was taken. <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />Correct. Also, the conditions <br />mentioned by Councilman Lathrop. <br /> <br /> Seconder, Hedding, accepted that. Roll call <br />Motion passed by a 6 - 0 vote with Howard being absent. <br /> <br />Mr. Schielke is the innocent party <br />here. I find it incomprehensible <br />that we're having this discussion <br />after the home is built, instead of <br />Storck coming to the Planning <br />Department and getting a variance. <br />It puts us (Council) into a <br />situation where I certainly am not <br />going to vote against Mr. Schielke <br />in terms of his home and/or the <br />development. I would hope that the <br />Planning staff would again express <br />my displeasure to Mr. Storck for his <br />conduct. Unfortunately, it's not <br />the first time that he has irritated <br />me. <br /> <br />ORDINANCE NO. 1104, SERIES 1993, AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN <br />PROPERTY REQUIRED FOR OPEN SPACE, PARK, OR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES <br />FOR THE BENEFIT, HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE OF THE CITIZENS OF <br />LOUISVILLE AND DESIGNATING ANAGENT ON BEHALF OFTHECITYTO ENGAGE <br />IN GOOD FAITH NEGOTIATIONS TO ACQUIRE SAID PROPERTY, AND UPON <br />FAILURE TO SECURE A NEGOTIATED ACQUISITION, AUTHORIZING THE CITY <br />ATTORNEY OR THE CITY ATTORNEY,S DESIGNEE TO PROCEED TO ACQUIRE SAID <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br /> <br />