My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1993 06 15
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1993 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1993 06 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:36 PM
Creation date
8/18/2004 11:36:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
6/15/1993
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1993 06 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Griffiths: Not at this time. <br /> <br />Howard felt it was important to have it in the agreement. <br /> <br />Lathrop moved that Council approve a revokable license agreement <br />between the City of Louisville and the Gerrity Oil & Gas <br />Corporation, as outlined in Council's packet, with the addition of <br />a clause requiring a $25,000.00 performance bond to cover <br />construction and reclamation of two wells and a tank battery in the <br />south half of the northwest quarter of Section 9, 1 S 69. Seconded <br />by Mayer. <br /> <br />Howard offer a friendly amendment that Council included the <br />statements by Councilman Sisk concerning the clarification of the <br />language and that a clause be added that states that a barrier will <br />be placed around the two wells near the ballfield location and that <br />a guard be posted while the drilling operations are taking place. <br /> <br />Lathrop: <br /> <br />If we haven't started construction, <br />do you think that would be necessary <br />at that point? Or, if we have <br />started construction of our <br />ballfields, I think I would tend to <br />agree with you. <br /> <br />Howard: <br /> <br />My problem is that it's not only <br />relatively close to the ballfield <br />site, but if it's an explosive well <br />fire like we saw in Lafayette, it's <br />still close enough to the street to <br />possibly cause injury, if we don't <br />have a barrier in place. <br /> <br />Lathrop accepted the friendly amendment. <br />that. <br /> <br />Griffiths: <br /> <br />Seconder, Mayer, accepted <br /> <br />We just received, tonight, Exhibit A <br />to the revokable license agreement, <br />which are the as built plans for the <br />pipelines. I would just ask that <br />the city staff be given the <br />opportunity to review those and make <br />sure those are adequate and perhaps, <br />as part of the motion you could say, <br />"subject to approval by city staff <br />or the City Public Works Director, <br />of Exhibit A." <br /> <br />Lathrop accepted that. Seconder, Mayer, accepted that. <br /> <br />Davidson called for any further Council comments. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.