Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville City Council Special Meeting <br />March 12, 2003 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Nancy Love, 841 Front Street, Louisville, CO, thanked Council for supplying the banners <br />for the St. Patrick's Day celebration. She invited everyone to participate on March 17th. <br /> <br />Tom Mayer, 580 Wildrose Way, Louisville, CO, reported receiving an email from the <br />City of Lafayette Librarian announcing they are considering charging for library cards. <br /> <br /> DISCUSSION DIRECTION - <br />SOUTH SUB AREA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION - OPENING COMMENTS <br /> <br />City Manager Bill Simmons stated the purpose of the meeting is to discuss and give <br />direction on generalized goals for the South Sub-Area. He explained the Steering <br />Committee has reviewed the matter for some time and at their March 4th meeting there <br />was consensus that Council should discuss and give direction on the goals. He explained <br />the process for the comprehensive plan amendment, as outlined in the Louisville <br />Municipal Code. He stated following the Finance Director's review of the fiscal impact <br />study, the stakeholders would make presentations about their desired plans. <br /> <br />OVERVIEW OF FISCAL IMPACT STUDY <br /> <br />Finance Director Charlene Laus stated the Fiscal Impact Analysis was developed as a <br />tool for the City of Louisville to analyze the fiscal impact of various possible uses of the <br />undeveloped land in the South Sub-area. The model was designed to estimate the cost to <br />the City of maintaining the same levels of service that the current community is <br />receiving. The model was developed using the best information available for estimating <br />impact 20-50 years into the future. <br /> <br />Laus explained the model contains a large number of assumptions and calculations of <br />revenue and cost variables that are applied to the different land use scenarios to determine <br />the estimated net fiscal impact that can be expected. Included in the model are estimates <br />of various revenue streams for both operating (on-going or annual) and capital <br />(development or one-time) revenues. The assumptions used for each of these revenue <br />sources are based on the most current information available to the City. <br /> <br />Laus pointed out the model is not perfect. The intent of the model is to provide a tool or a <br />framework for determining possible fiscal impacts to the City for the various <br />development proposals. The revenue assumptions and cost variables are the same in each <br />scenario. The inputs for the model are the development estimates and the build-out <br />schedule for the proposed development. The model currently contains build-out schedule <br />that are evenly distributed over a number of years. The actual build-out schedules will be <br />critical in determining the true impacts to the City and will need to be adjusted as better <br />information in this area is obtained. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br /> <br />