Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 5, 2016 <br />Page 12 of 15 <br />However, if needed, staff can direct the applicant to get professional help on a traffic <br />control plan. Mayor Muckle agreed. <br />Council member Loo felt the traffic control plan should be verified by a professional. <br />She asked if Council member Stolzmann was suggesting the City's Traffic Engineer <br />verify the traffic control plan. <br />Council member Stolzmann stated if the City Traffic Engineer is reviewing it, it would not <br />be appropriate to have a certified engineer submit the traffic control plan and it would <br />not add value to the permit. <br />Council member Loo asked if there are a lot of plans submitted that do not meet the <br />Traffic Engineer's requirements. Public Relations Manager Muth explained about one <br />third of the submittals meet the requirement and the balance do not. <br />Council member Loo stated two thirds of non - compliance is a lot. She felt it would be <br />more beneficial to the City to put the cost off to a certified traffic engineer. <br />Mayor Muckle asked what a certified engineer's traffic control plan would cost. It was <br />noted by a public member that the cost would be $100. Mayor Muckle supported the <br />staff's recommendation on a certified traffic engineer's traffic control plan. <br />Council member Loo addressed the issue of the decibel levels and preferred to have <br />that matter come back for City Council review. She requested information about what <br />other communities do about decibel levels. Her concern centered on having an <br />ordinance that is not enforced. Public Relations Manager Muth stated she and Chief <br />Hayes looked at ordinances from the cities of Boulder, Denver and Lafayette and staff's <br />proposal is in line with those municipalities. <br />Council member Loo asked if staff could inquire about the enforcement of theses <br />ordinances. Mayor Muckle agreed more work was needed on the decibel levels if there <br />is to be an enforceable ordinance. <br />1125 PINE STREET MINOR REPLAT <br />1. ORDINANCE No. 1711, SERIES 2016 — AN ORDINANCE APPROVNG A <br />REZONING OF A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED AT 1125 PINE STREET <br />FROM CITY OF LOUISVILLE COMMERCIAL COMMUNITY (CC) TO <br />MIXED -USE RESIDENTIAL (MU -R) AND RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM <br />DENISTY (R -M) AND AMENDING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE OLD <br />TOWN OVERLAY DISTRICT IN CONNECTION THEREWITH — 1ST <br />READING — SET PUBLIC HEARING 01/19/16 <br />2. RESOLUTION No. 2, SERIES 2016 — A RESOLUTION APPROVING A <br />REPLAT TO COMBINE THREE PARCELS AND SUBDIVIDE THE <br />