My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2016 01 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2016 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2016 01 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:39 PM
Creation date
1/20/2016 10:21:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2016 01 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 5, 2016 <br />Page 12 of 15 <br />However, if needed, staff can direct the applicant to get professional help on a traffic <br />control plan. Mayor Muckle agreed. <br />Council member Loo felt the traffic control plan should be verified by a professional. <br />She asked if Council member Stolzmann was suggesting the City's Traffic Engineer <br />verify the traffic control plan. <br />Council member Stolzmann stated if the City Traffic Engineer is reviewing it, it would not <br />be appropriate to have a certified engineer submit the traffic control plan and it would <br />not add value to the permit. <br />Council member Loo asked if there are a lot of plans submitted that do not meet the <br />Traffic Engineer's requirements. Public Relations Manager Muth explained about one <br />third of the submittals meet the requirement and the balance do not. <br />Council member Loo stated two thirds of non - compliance is a lot. She felt it would be <br />more beneficial to the City to put the cost off to a certified traffic engineer. <br />Mayor Muckle asked what a certified engineer's traffic control plan would cost. It was <br />noted by a public member that the cost would be $100. Mayor Muckle supported the <br />staff's recommendation on a certified traffic engineer's traffic control plan. <br />Council member Loo addressed the issue of the decibel levels and preferred to have <br />that matter come back for City Council review. She requested information about what <br />other communities do about decibel levels. Her concern centered on having an <br />ordinance that is not enforced. Public Relations Manager Muth stated she and Chief <br />Hayes looked at ordinances from the cities of Boulder, Denver and Lafayette and staff's <br />proposal is in line with those municipalities. <br />Council member Loo asked if staff could inquire about the enforcement of theses <br />ordinances. Mayor Muckle agreed more work was needed on the decibel levels if there <br />is to be an enforceable ordinance. <br />1125 PINE STREET MINOR REPLAT <br />1. ORDINANCE No. 1711, SERIES 2016 — AN ORDINANCE APPROVNG A <br />REZONING OF A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED AT 1125 PINE STREET <br />FROM CITY OF LOUISVILLE COMMERCIAL COMMUNITY (CC) TO <br />MIXED -USE RESIDENTIAL (MU -R) AND RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM <br />DENISTY (R -M) AND AMENDING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE OLD <br />TOWN OVERLAY DISTRICT IN CONNECTION THEREWITH — 1ST <br />READING — SET PUBLIC HEARING 01/19/16 <br />2. RESOLUTION No. 2, SERIES 2016 — A RESOLUTION APPROVING A <br />REPLAT TO COMBINE THREE PARCELS AND SUBDIVIDE THE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.