City Council Minutes 1993 10 05 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Davidson called for further Council comments. NO~ Davidson moved that Council preliminarily approve Resolution No. 36, Series 1993, authorize the Mayor to sign the accompanying letter, send it out to the residents of Louisville for comment, and set a further consideration of Resolution No. 36 at the first meeting in November, subject to the previously noted change. Seconded by Howard. Roll call was taken. Motion passed by a 7 - 0 vote. COS~INUEDPUBLIC HEARING -RENEWAL OF TAVERN LIQUOR LICENSE - TRACK INN Davidson stated thatthe Liquor Licensing Authority is represented by Attorney Susan Griffiths. Attorney Bruce Joss was present to re~resent the Louisville Police Department. Cl~ Patzer, President and principle shareholder in the 1006 Pine Co~oration, the applicant was present, as was their attorney Donald Humphrey, partner in the law firm of Martin & Mchaffy, Boulder, Colorado. SuE~an Griffiths, Attorney for the Liquor Licensing Authority, stated that this is a continuation of a hearing that was opened originally on September 20, 1993 and was continued at the request of the applicant until this date. This continued hearing was to consider the application of 1006 Pine, Inc., and the City Council wa~: acting as in a quasi-judicial capacity as the local Licensing Authority under state law. The Authority's decision at this meeting must be based on the evidence presented to it at the hearing and the legal requirements set out by state law. Griffiths stated, as a reminder, that all of the non-attorney witnesses would be sworn in at this meeting by the City Clerk. Davidson asked theLouisville's Police Department's attorney, Bruce Jo~s, if the Police Department had any presentation to make to the Authority, including any documents or witnesses. Bz~[ce Joss, attorney for the Louisville Police Department, stated that they had one witness, and that the Authority had already received the memorandum dated September 16, 1993, which they would be referring to during this hearing, and there may be some add[itional documents to present during the testimony. Gri.ffiths reviewed the documents contained in Council's packet on this item (SEE ATTACHED), stated that? these are the type of documents the Authority receives and considers prior to each renewal application. Also made a part of the record at the opening of the hearing on September 20, 1993, was a September 20 notice to the applicant advising the applicant regarding the retention of