Laserfiche WebLink
Davidson: <br /> <br />Are there any other matters, which <br />should be considered by this <br />Authority? None at all? Close of <br />the hearing? A motion would now be <br />in order. Chuck. <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />Mr. Mayor, I move that the Liquor <br />Licensing Authority in the City of <br />Louisville, that we direct the <br />Authority attorney to prepare a <br />draft, findings, conclusion and <br />decision to deny the applicant's <br />renewal application for <br />consideration by this Authority .... <br />and that the matter be continued <br />until October 6, 1993 for that <br />draft. <br /> <br />Ho~,ard: <br /> <br />Second. <br /> <br />Davidson: <br /> <br />Gri. ffiths: <br /> <br />Is there discussion on this motion <br />or is it just right to a vote? <br /> <br />Certainly, discussion is possible. <br />Just for clarification, you say for <br />consideration by the Authority at, <br />um, I assume that date should be <br />October 6 for consideration by the <br />Authority at it's October 6 meeting <br />and that the matter be continued <br /> <br />Sis. k: <br /> <br />Griffiths: <br /> <br />Where the Authority <br />reconvened, yes? <br /> <br />Okay. <br /> <br />would be <br /> <br />Davidson: <br /> <br />Thank you. <br />discussion. <br /> <br />Is there any Council <br />Rob. <br /> <br />Lathrop: <br /> <br />I had a question. Um, and I guess, <br />I guess for City attorney, ah, <br />concerning, um, a probationary <br />period .... Is that a possible thing <br />or is it not? <br /> <br />Griffiths: <br /> <br />There's really nothing in the statue <br />right now ~and Counsel can correct <br />me, if he knows something different. <br />But there's nothing in the statutes <br />now that permits such a probationary <br />period to exist for any period <br />shorter than one year. The only <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />