City Council Minutes 1993 10 19 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

No. 1123, to zone, the subject property. The applicant was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on August 19, 1993. City Council passed Resolution 34 about eligibility 51 on Se~.tember 7, 1993. The zoning is designated as rural residential an6. the one comment at first reading was that the legal description be revised and it has been revised on the Ordinance to reflect and be the same as what was shown on the Plat. Timothy S. Beaton, 1013 Jefferson Avenue, Louisville, CO. (Sign-up participant) Mr. Beaton appreciates the Council letting this annexation go foI~ard. He wanted to point out that originally proposed RE zoning, the Council determined that it should be RR. Some Council Me~ers at the last Council Meeting, indicated that, if there were certain changes in the PUD those changes were a decrease in the amount of units in the Bridgefield Subdivision from 7 to 6 and a proposed 9,000 square foot outlie, which will be a park or recreational area, they might consider allowing two units on this property to be annexed. The Council is going to have to take up the PUD later, but just to bring these matters to the Council's attention and expressed to them his appreciation of the annexation going forward at this time. Davidson asked for anyone in the audience, who wished to speak in favor or against Ordinance 1122. Gail Wetrogan, 930 McKinley, Louisville, CO. (Sign-up participant) She spoke to the annexation. The Beatons worked along with Jim Leach on the two pieces, which together are going to be a project. I just want to say they have put a lot of effort into working with the neighbors and I, as one of the neighbors, am very pleased with what they came up and hope the Council will be open to some of the changes in the Plat, knowing that the neighbors are in favor of them and have been consulted all along. Even though the Council is kind of taking a hard line these days on PUD's that you have a good one here and the neighbors I have talked to are in favor. Davidson asked again for anyone, who wanted to speak on Ordinance 1122. There were no other, so the public hearing was closed and go on to Council Comments and Questions. Howard asked the Attorney, if the combined proposal would meet the zoning requirements for RE? Griffiths answered that she couldn't answer that, but that maybe Paul could answer as she has not seen the combined proposal. Paul Wood indicated that they just received the revised planning and development plan on October 11. It looks very close to all lots, without exception, are at least 12,000 square feet, set-backs are in compliance with RE set-back