City Council Minutes 1993 10 19 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Griffiths stated that it was an Ordinance amending Title 17 of the Louisville Municipal Code and Title Zoning by zoning property owned by tendency known by Timothy and Barbara Beaton known as the Beaton Annexation. Davidson then opened the public hearing. Staff comments have already been made. He then asked for audience participation. No one wanted to speak, so the public hearing was closed and he asked for Council comments, questions and motions. Ho~'ard moved that the Council approve Ordinance No. 1123, Series 1993, zoning of annex property, Beaton property, on second and final reading. Seconded by Lathrop. Roll Call Vote. Yes: Hornbostel, Howard, Lathrop, Mayer, Hedding, and Davidson, 5/0, pas, sed. ORDINANCE NO. 1128, SERIES 1993 - COAL CREEK RANCH FILING NO. 1 - VAf~TION OF UTILITYAND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT - 2NDREADING - PU~LIC HEARING (PUBL. LSVL. TIMES 10-9-93) Griffiths indicated this was an Ordinance transferring by quick claim deed any title and interest of the Louisville in an easement. Davidson opened the public hearing and asked Paul Wood to present the staff presentation. Wood indicated that this ordinance came to the Council for second reading tonight. It was approved on first hearing on October 6. It is a request by the applicant, Coal Creek Associates, to release the City's interest in a portion of a ten foot emergency access and utility easement on Lot 90 of Coal Creek Ranch Filing 1 or also known as 630 Manwood Lane. The purpose of the release of the eas. ement would be to remedy a building encroachment. The applicant is in the audience. Davidson then requested audience participation either in favor or against this ordinance. There were none, so the public hearing was closed and the asked for Council comments, questions, and motions. Hed.ding made a motion that Council adopt Ordinance 1128, Series 1993, transferring title and interest in the easement to Coal Creek Ranch Filing No. 1, Lot 90, second and final reading. Seconded by Lathrop. Mayer said that he felt that since this was an error on the part of the applicant and City time was expended some compensation to the City is due in a reasonable amount of $100. I put that in the form of a motion. Seconded by Hornbostel. Davidson then repeated the amendment to the motion to include $100. The first vote will be on the amendment. Griffith made the statement that they were not amending the ordinance, but a motion 5