Laserfiche WebLink
SUBJECT: <br />DATE: <br />BAP PROGRAM REVIEW <br />FEBRUARY 1, 2016 <br />PAGE2OF4 <br />• Rebates of the City's Building permit fees on improvements to property. Typical <br />agreements include a 50% rebate of fees. <br />• Rebates of the City's general 3% construction use tax on materials related to <br />improving property. Typical agreements include a 50% rebate of these taxes. <br />• Rebates of the City's general 3% consumer use tax levied on equipment <br />purchases related to the expansion /creation of the business that have a useful <br />life greater than 3 years. Typical agreements include a 50% rebate of these <br />taxes. <br />DISCUSSION: <br />Staff develops annually a report on the inputs and outputs of assistance agreements <br />approved and implemented throughout the program's history. Attached is the most <br />recent report from August 2015. Below is the summary chart within that report. <br />Retail Commercial <br />Total <br />Incentives Paid <br />Retained Jobs <br />Created Jobs <br />Total Jobs <br />Total Annual Wages <br />Average Wage /Salary <br />Annual Sales Tax <br />Permit Fees Paid <br />Construction Cost <br />$ 801,573 $ <br />27 <br />257 <br />284 <br />$ 5,349,240 $ <br />$ 18,835 $ <br />$ 671,204 <br />$ 321,737 $ <br />$ 11,313,354 $ <br />Incentives per Job $ 2,822 <br />Annual Sales Tax $ per Incentive $ $ 0.84 <br />Construction $ per Incentive $ $ <br />487,053 <br />1,057 <br />1,306 <br />2,363 <br />209,013,336 <br />88,453 <br />N/A <br />1,465,466 <br />42,472,402 <br />N/A <br />14.11 $ <br />206 <br />$ 1,288,627 <br />1,084 <br />1,563 <br />2,647 <br />$ 214,362,576 <br />$ 80,916 <br />$ 671,204 <br />$ 1,787,203 <br />$ 53,785,756 <br />$ 487 <br />N/A <br />87.20 $ 41.74 <br />Suggested clarifications and changes to the Municipal Code <br />In the attached redline version of the BAP ordinance, staff has proposed changes to: <br />• Reflect the implementation of Consumer Use Tax rebates <br />o The Ordinance had not been adapted to incorporate the Consumer Use <br />Tax creation in 2010. Expanding businesses can make significant <br />purchases that the Consumer Use Tax is imposed. <br />• Clarify the expansion of existing employers as a qualifying project <br />o Language doesn't exist to explicitly state that expansion of existing <br />employers is a qualifying project. Encouraging existing employers that <br />have already chosen Louisville to expand is critical to the City's business <br />retention activities. <br />• Modify qualifying project timeframes from the first year to an expansion period. <br />o Some projects have significant expansion plans that cannot be completed <br />in one year. Ramping up production and its related equipment purchases <br />CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br />9 <br />