Laserfiche WebLink
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 21, 2008 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />Kron noted this was a first step in the process and that a public meeting to get additional <br />input will be scheduled. <br />Resolution No. 2, Series 2008 - A Resolution Recommending the City Council <br />Place a Question on the 2008 Ballot Regarding the Implementation of a 1/8% Sales <br />Tax Dedicated to Historic Preservation <br />Muth reminded members that at the March meeting they asked for staff to prepare a <br />resolution that would list how preservation funds could be spent should the City Council <br />place a ballot question on the 2008 ballot to create a new historic preservation sales tax. <br />Muth presented a draft resolution for the HPC's consideration. <br />Members reviewed the resolution and asked that the order of the list of possible uses for <br />such funding be changed slightly, but otherwise agreed to the draft. <br />McMenamin moved to approve the resolution as amended, Whiteman seconded the <br />motion. It was approved unanimously. <br />Update Louisville Middle School Demolition -Joint City Council/Boulder Valley <br />School Board Meeting, May 7, 3:30 PM, Louisville Middle Schocx <br />Muth reported that the joint meeting of the BVSD School Board and the City Council is <br />scheduled for May 7th. She noted the recent article in the Louisville Times that states <br />clearly that the facade demolition is going to happen. She stated that Mayor Sisk asked <br />her to ask the HPC if the meeting should still take place or if it would do more harm than <br />good. <br />Koertje stated that he felt strongly that the meeting should go on if for no other reason <br />than to have a chance for the community to address the school board here in Louisville. <br />He added that there are other historic schools on which work is expected in the next <br />phase of the bond issue and he felt the school board should understand the community's <br />preservation concerns. <br />Tofte agreed with Koertje that the meeting should definitely be held. <br />Members were in agreement that canceling the meeting would make it worse for the <br />community and the City Council. <br />Muth stated she would report back to the Mayor the thoughts of the HPC. <br />Lewis thanked Koertje for all his work on this issue. <br />Discussion/Direction/Action -Preservation Ordinance Amendments <br />Recommend continuation of item to May 19 <br />Muth reported she and the City Attorney had not had a chance to address the changes <br />from the last meeting and requested that the item be continued to May 19. Members <br />were in agreement. <br />