My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Business Retention and Development Committee Minutes 2007 12 03
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUSINESS RETENTION & DEV COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Business Retention and Development Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2007 Business Retention and Development Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Business Retention and Development Committee Minutes 2007 12 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:09:40 PM
Creation date
6/11/2008 10:07:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BRADMIN 2007 12 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Business Retention & Development Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 3, 2007 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br />should be looked at to determine if it is something that can be done or not and to get <br />feedback to the businesses. City Manager Fleming agreed with Mr. Lathrop that the <br />comments should be looked at and decide what we can do versus what we can't do and <br />who should do what. <br /> <br />Councilor Dalton said that there should be a discussion about how do we get information <br />to the bigger business for timely action. He referred to last winter's road conditions as an <br />example. He said he would topic added to the next meeting and that a matrix indicating <br />who, what, feasibility and feedback to communicator may be helpful. <br /> <br />Ms. Hogan said that these were all things that can be included into the 2008 <br />also said that City projects can have various impacts depending on the space <br />She referred to CTC and the NW Rail project. She said that the busi~~sses at Care <br />concerned about the impact the NW Rail will have on "their" space an' that discussions <br />should include business even when they are not in the immediate area <br /> <br /> <br />There was an inquiry about the Pasquini's building and si Ms. Hogan said that her <br />understanding was that the new business "Empire" was d total remodel and were <br />hoping to open by mid-December, but she didn't think they we oing to meet that goal. <br />Mr. Keany said that he had just been there and t had indicated that they were going <br />to open by December 15th. <br /> <br /> <br />The CEO Breakfast was brought up. City Manager Fleming said that he had contacted <br />John Sackett from Avista but had not heard back from him. He said that he would do a <br />follow-up call this week. Ms. Hogan stated that BRaD's role should be what can we do to <br />facilitate it, but that the invite should from Avista not from the City/BRaD. She said <br />that this type of function will help bu to know what other businesses are local, <br />which can help them operate more e y. <br /> <br />The map that the Chambe ommerce is making was discussed. Ms. Laureti said that <br />they were being proofed. .d that they are hoping to post larger signs with the map <br />at the athletic fields, park her strategic places around the City. Mr. Elari said that <br />part of the delay w because it was funded by advertisement. Mr. Keany asked if only <br />businesses that . ed were on the map. Ms. Laureti said that the map was color <br />coded, showing rent type of business locations and that businesses who paid for <br />advertisement wou ve their names located on the map in the area they were located <br />but at not every bus ess in the City was listed on the map. <br /> <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY UPDATE <br />n gave an update on her development activities for the month. <br /> <br />SHOP LOUISVILLE UPDATE <br />Councilor Dalton said that the subcommittee met with Mark and Jon about the proposed <br />budget. He said that they had scoped down the proposal to $48,000, keeping the <br />essential elements although some had been slimmed down. He said that the campaign <br />was different then other shop campaigns because it is meant to change behavior <br />through the internet not just through print. Councilor Dalton believed that the City should <br />try this proposal but a matrix needs to be made to help determine if it is being effective. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.