My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1993 12 21
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1993 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1993 12 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:37 PM
Creation date
8/27/2004 2:28:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
12/21/1993
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1993 12 21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
outlet works modification, the first segment. Longmont's decision <br />is to continue their participation from that point down to where <br />the pipeline will branch off to the east and take over <br />participation that originally had been requested by Public Service. <br /> <br />Howard: <br /> <br />On Page 4, item "e.," what happens <br />if we don't use our pro rata share <br />of any excesses? <br /> <br />Trout: <br /> <br />Howard: <br /> <br />If you don't use it, you could lease <br />it to somebody else, or you could <br />sell it. If you don't do anything, <br />it's not used by anybody. Under the <br />Contact other participants do not <br />have the right to use your capacity <br />without your specific approval. <br /> <br />On item "g.,,, what happens <br />don't participate? Are we <br />reimbursed under this clause? <br /> <br />if we <br />still <br /> <br />Trout affirmed this. <br /> <br />Howard: <br /> <br />On Page 7, iii., you don't appear to <br />have enough head to generate any <br />substantial hydroelectric power. Is <br />there any chance of a hydroelectric <br />power station being put into place? <br /> <br />Trout stated that there.was not. <br /> <br />Howard: <br /> <br />Page 8, 6.a., second line from the <br />bottom, the $8,200 Allottee shall <br />pay additional, what is this <br />additional pre-construction cost <br />for? <br /> <br />Trout stated that those were costs that were not anticipated at the <br />time the original estimate was made less than a year ago. <br /> <br />Howard: <br /> <br />On Page 9, b.i., the safety margin <br />of 5%, it wasn't clear to me what <br />happens if the project goes over the <br />5%. Are we going to get an <br />additional billing or is that going <br />to be taken over by the District? <br /> <br />Trout explained that initially each participant paid 105% of <br />construction costs. The first 5% the District will use for change <br />orders and to pay any additional pre-construction costs that have <br />not been anticipated. If and when the first 5% has been depleted, <br />there is the other 5% that participants are required to pay into <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.