Laserfiche WebLink
Mayer was concerned that this had gone on for three months. If it <br />were continued until January, it would be four months. He felt it <br />was time to expedite the matter. <br /> <br />Howard felt the applicant should have previously requested a work <br />session with Council. <br /> <br />Zukaitis felt he wanted to do that. <br /> <br />Hornbostel explained to Zukaitis that it wasngt that Council didn't <br />understand that he wanted to bring in two houses, it was that the <br />zoning Zukaitis asked for would allow three. At a later time, <br />someone could come in and have that zoning for three houses instead <br />of two. <br /> <br />Peter Kernkamp, Planner, stated that the Planning Commission <br />recommended RR zoning, because of the access constraints, it was <br />only appropriate for one house. In the Planning Co~issiongs <br />discussion they indicated that some sort of a PUD with the adjacent <br />undeveloped property that improves the access to the property and <br />at that point two units might be appropriate. <br /> <br />Davidson suggested that Council continue this until January 4, <br />1994. <br /> <br />Sisk suggested that Council continue this until January, 4, 1994, <br />or, as an alternative, allow Mr. Zukaitis to resubmit a plan that <br />would go through the Planning Commission wherein the City would not <br />charge Mr. Zukaitis the extra fees that would be required normally <br />with a new one. <br /> <br />Davidson opened the public hearing calling for anyone in the <br />audience wishing to speak in favor or against Ordinance No. 1126. <br /> <br />NONE <br /> <br />Howard moved that Council continue this hearing until January 4, <br />1994, at which time the applicant can either come before Council <br />with additional presentation time allowed or with no additional <br />city costs to the applicant, and at that time choose to start the <br />process over again. Seconded by Sisk. Roll call was taken. <br />Motion passed by a 5 - 2 vote with Davidson and Hornbostel voting <br />against. Davidson clarified his vote by saying that he was in <br />favor of continuing the hearing, but not in favor of waiving the <br />city fees. <br /> <br />ORDINANCE NO. 1127, SERIES 1993 - AN~NDING TITLE 17 OF THE <br />LOUISVI?.?.~MUNICIPALCODEENTITLED mZONINGm BY ZONING PROPERTY <br />OWNED BY THOMASP. ZUK~ITISKNOWNASTHEZ~TIS~TION - <br /> 2ND READING - PUBLIC HEARING - (REQUEST TO CONTINUE TO <br />1/18/94) <br /> <br /> <br />