My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1987 02 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1987 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1987 02 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:27 PM
Creation date
7/15/2008 8:50:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
2/3/1987
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1987 02 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
opinions may not even be necessary. Sackett <br />stated that an advisory opinion could come from <br />the City Attorney until such time as an allegation <br />is made and the Prosecuting Attorney would then <br />take necessary action. <br />Mayor Fauson stated his appreciation for Ms. <br />Nick's observations of the amendments and wanted <br />to see the section relating to Advisory Opinions <br />remain in the code; however, the language may need <br />to be addressed and. asked for further Council <br />comments. <br />Szymanski asked if there is a difference in a <br />verbal opinion and a written opinion, and do both <br />constitute a written opinion by the Prosecuting <br />Attorney. <br />Rautenstraus stated that there is a difference as <br />a written opinion "becomes binding on the City and <br />City Council and the City Attorney with respect to <br />subsequent actions that were requested in the <br />advisory opinion. There is a section that talks <br />about how this opinion can be reversed by a vote <br />of 2/3 of the members of Council." <br />Szymanski stated that regardless of the ethics <br />ordinance, the integrity of person who wants to do <br />what is right may need an advisory opinion, but "I <br />don't think you should have to bear your soul to <br />the world to get that opinion in order to do a <br />proper job." <br />Anderson agreed that this is a very difficult <br />determination to make. He has asked for advisory <br />opinions and exercised some caring in outlining <br />the circumstance so that it was understood to the <br />best of his ability, but there is a certain amount <br />of right to privacy for Councilmembers, employees <br />and board members. Also, expedience is a factor <br />in obtaining an opinion. <br />Carnival stated that in his opinion if there is <br />one instance that making an opinion public would <br />hurt the best interest of the City, then this <br />clause is important: to have in the Ethics Code. <br />Who makes that decision or determination, whether <br />it be the prosecuting attorney or the City <br />Council, is at the core of this specific <br />amendment. Carnival was "leaning" more toward <br />City Council as they are directly accountable to <br />the public whereas the prosecuting attorney isn't. <br />Anderson stated that City Council may need a legal <br />advisor in making such determinations. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.