Laserfiche WebLink
Wanush explained that the property at 8330 Cherry <br />Street is zoned CB. An equipment rental center <br />wishes to locate on this property. This use is a <br />Special Review Use in the CB zone. Planning <br />Commission reviewed this at their meeting on <br />September 8, 1987, and recommends approval. <br />Wanush asked that comments made during the previous <br />Agenda item be entered as record and considered for <br />this Agenda item also. <br />This Resolution allows for the rental center on lot <br />one. <br />Mayor Fauson moved that Resolution #24 be adopted. <br />Szymanski seconded. Unanimous. <br />RESOLUTION #25 - CLEMENTINE <br />SUBDIVISION Rautenstraus read in its entirety Resolution #25, "A <br />Resolution approving a final plat for Clementine <br />Subdivision." <br />Wanush stated that the applicants, Edward E. and <br />Ruth I. Wilson, request subdivision of a 4.03 acre <br />parcel currently owned by Clementine Romano at 301 <br />East Street. The subdivision would place an <br />existing residence ion a .91 acre lot and create <br />another 2.91 acre lot, proposed for a group home. <br />The special review for the group home is the <br />following agenda it~sm. At the September 8th public <br />hearing, Planning Commission recommended approval <br />with three conditions: 1) the owners agree to limit <br />development to two residential units or one <br />residential unit and one group home. Hydrants are <br />required by the firs marshal and a durable, dust <br />retardant surface for their frontage along East <br />Street are needed. The applicant agrees to bring <br />any increase in density or use beyond this to the <br />Commission and Council for approval; 2) applicant is <br />only required to pay normal tap and building permit <br />fees. Easements and right-of-ways to be shown on <br />the plat and dedicated by applicant; 3) 12~ cash-in- <br />lieu of land may be collected if and when additional <br />development occurs on the property. <br />Edward Wilson, applicant, stated that the 12$ cash- <br />in-lieu of land would be very difficult to pay at <br />this time and woulci be glad to pay it if and when <br />other development occurs. <br />Szymanski asked as ~to the reason Planning Commission <br />chose to collect the cash-in-lieu of land while <br />postponing other fees until future development <br />occurs. <br />9 <br />