My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1987 12 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1987 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1987 12 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:28 PM
Creation date
7/15/2008 9:43:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
12/1/1987
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1987 12 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
n those main arterials is not only what we want as <br />a City to give good visual aspects of our City, but <br />also it enhances the development. In that sense, <br />the development profits by it, making a more sale- <br />able product for the development. Once it is in, <br />sodded and sprinkled, that's a forever thing for the <br />City to maintain...continuous mowing, watering, etc. <br />I feel that the developer should do these on the <br />main arterials. I realize that we are going to be <br />discussing these feE~s at our next Work Session, but <br />I think that the fees that we do derive, don't <br />necessarily have to go back into that exact develop- <br />ment....we use those fees elsewhere throughout the <br />City that helps that. development such as entry fea- <br />tures, etc. so that when you come into our City we <br />have these nice amenities. People then want to live <br />here and will buy a house in that development. <br />Therefore, those fees should not necessarily go back <br />directly into that immediate area. I realize some <br />of it should, but I don't think any large portion of <br />it needs to go back in." <br />Mayor Fauson further stated that any development <br />that comes into the City impacts us in a lot of <br />ways. "Those fees that we get from these <br />developments help us to minimize these impacts. <br />Those are my feelings on that subject." <br />Szymanski agreed with Mayor Fauson's comments <br />stating that that is how the City has done business <br />in the past and doesn't see any reason to change it <br />now. Szymanski would only agree to these four <br />subdivisions under the provisions recommended by <br />Planning Commission. <br />Sackett stated that he would like to see any <br />cobblestone eliminated and replace it with sod. <br />Sackett also had concerns with homeowner's <br />associations and their ability to maintain open <br />area in the development. <br />Both Wanush and Hoyt stated that if properly formed, <br />homeowner associations can and do work. <br />Wanush stated that it becomes an issue of whether <br />the City accepts as dedicated land anything that <br />developers do not want to use. Staff is saying that <br />if there are areas that that are not acceptable, <br />then it is up to the developer to form a homeowners <br />association that meets certain criteria to maintain <br />those area. <br />Mohr stated that since the Council is going to be <br />considering this same issue on another development <br />in a Work Session later this week, would it be <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.