Laserfiche WebLink
Davidson moved that Council approve the Consent Agenda. <br />by Howard. All in favor with Hedding being absent. <br /> <br />Seconded <br /> <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES (12/9/93 & 12/21/93) <br />APPROVAL OF BITJ~ <br />AW~d~D BID - SUBMERSIBLE WASTEWATERPUMPS <br />AW~D BID - LOUISVILLE CEMETERY GRAVE DIGGING SERVICES <br />APPROVE SETmCTION OF HARTRONFTASSOCIATES, P.C., TO PROVIDE <br /> ARCHITECTURAL ANDENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THELOUISVILLEPUBLIC <br /> LIBRARY EXPANSION PROJECT AND APPROVE THE SCOPE OF PRELIMINARY <br /> WORK <br /> <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS - ON ITEMS NoT ON THE AGENDA <br /> <br />Davidson called for anyone in the audience wishing to speak on any <br />items not on the Agenda. <br /> <br />NOSrE <br /> <br />COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS ON PERTINENT ITEMS <br /> NOT ON THE AGENDA <br /> <br />Davidson called for any Council informational items. <br /> <br />NONE <br /> <br />REGULAR BUSINESS <br /> <br />ST~.'~.ET LIGHTS ON MCCASLIN <br /> <br />Mayer stated that he and Howard had been contacted by several <br />residents, whose homes border along McCaslin, with their concerns <br />about the excessive lighting spilling onto their property. Dan <br />Blankenship, City Engineer, proposed that the project be delayed <br />fora couple of weeks, with there being no cost to Homart or to the <br />City. During this time solutions would be researched. <br /> <br />Howard stated that the citizens felt that by continuing placement <br />of the lighting without any additional regard to the aesthetics and <br />the lighting needs of the area would be a disservice. They wanted <br />their input into the situation. He wanted Council to suggest that <br />the Homart Corporation ask Public Service Company to suspend the <br />current activities for a two week period and work with City staff <br />to come up with the best mix of lighting to meet all of the needs. <br /> <br />Davidson: <br /> <br />Is that a motion? <br /> <br />Howard: <br /> <br />It's a motion. <br /> <br />Lathrop offered a friendly amendment that Homart Development not be <br />held responsible for any delays that may occur, if this project is <br />delayed on Public Service Company's schedule. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br /> <br />