City Council Minutes 2003 04 15 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Louisville City Council Meeting April 15, 2OO3 Page 4 of 14 Davidson called for Staff presentation. Planning Director Paul Wood reported the applicant and owner, The Colorado Tech Land Company, LLC, is requesting a rezoning of a portion of CB parcel located at the northwest comer of Dillon Road and South 104th Street. The purpose of the rezoning is to reduce the area of the CB parcel at 10.7 acres to correspond to the proposed area of Lot 12, which would be 7.53 acres. The rezoning is limited to the north and west perimeter of Parcel D, or proposed Lot 12. The Planning Commission determined the requested rezoning would serve a beneficial purpose in avoiding a situation where lots contiguous to the proposed Lot 12 would have a dual zone designation and approved the request without conditions. Davidson opened the public hearing and asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak in favor or against Ordinance No. 1419, Series 2003. There were no comments. MOTION: Brown moved for Council approval of Ordinance No. 1419, Series 2003, seconded by Sisk. Roll call vote was taken. The motion passed by a vote of 7-0. PUBLIC HEARING ON ZONING ANNEXATION OF THE RAY PROPERTY - public hearing (advertised .Daily Camera 3/8/03) RESOLUTION NO. 8, SERIES 2003 - A RESOLUTION CONCERNING A PETITION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF LOUISVILLE, COLORADO, KNOWN AS THE RAY ANNEXATION, AND FINDING THE AREA PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED ELIGIBLE FOR ANNEXATION City Attorney Sam Light noted under state statute, the City must hold a public hearing on the merits of the proposal and receive testimony on the annexation and zoning. Davidson called for Staff presentation. Planning Director Paul Wood reviewed Resolution No. 8, Series 2003, which establishes the parcel is eligible for annexation and meets all the requirements. The subject property is a .56-acre unincorporated parcel owned by James S. Ray and Christina Dozauer-Ray. He explained the Ray's approached the County for a building permit and were referred to the City for the purchase of a sewer tap. He stressed this is a small annexation with a single-family residence. Upon Council consideration of the annexation, Ordinance No. 1416, proposes the SF-MD zoning of property. As a condition of the annexation, the applicant would convey to the City a conservation easement, which is a covenant restricting the use of the parcel to one single-family residence. Davidson opened the public heating and asked if anyone in the audienCe wished to speak for or against annexation. There were no comments. 4