Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />April 15, 2003 <br />Page 9 of 14 <br /> <br />to by the Open Space Advisory Board which states "After giving due consideration to the <br />existing Trails Master Plan, identify lands where ecological impacts from passive <br />recreation area relatively minimal and are appropriate for trails and recommend on such <br />lands how trails can be located and built so that they will have the least adverse impact on <br />the ecosystem." Light voiced his opinion that the sections are not proscriptive of <br />mandatory management, but rather the process of making recommendation to Council. <br /> <br />Brown asked Lair if the current alignment has the least impact on the ecosystem. Lair <br />stated considering all the factors this alignment has the least impact on the ecosystem, as <br />the trail goes under the underpass at Dillon Road, and does not come close to Coal Creek <br />again until US36. She stressed the design team felt it did not compromise the ecosystem. <br /> <br />Brown asked if the current alignment has the least environmental impact. Lair stated if <br />the onlY criteria examined were the environmental impact, the least impact would be the <br />trail next to Dillon Road. <br /> <br />Van Pelt asked if the current alignment is consistent with the master plan. Lair stated the <br />Coal Creek Master Plan documents the planning process for the Coal Creek/Rock Creek <br />Trail. She stated the Coal Creek/Rock Creek Master Plan called for a bridge over US36. <br />The current bridge is over a drainage ditch, which is far better than a bridge over US36. <br /> <br />Levihn asked about the consideration of the golf course and voiced his concern many <br />golfers are looking for their golf balls in the riparian area. He did not believe the trail <br />would be as disruptive as the golfers. Lair stated the Board has discussed that issue as <br />well and believes the trail won't make the current situation any better. <br /> <br />Sisk asked if the project has been delayed. Lair stated the contractor has been asked to <br />work on other parts of the trail. <br /> <br />Sisk asked Jones what professionals have identified the area as riparian. Jones stated <br />Don DiAmico, City of Boulder Ecologist, looked at photos of the area and suggested it be <br />buffered. Dave Buckner, a Plant Ecologist for ESCO & Associates recommended not <br />having trails in those locations. Based on his knowledge and expertise, Jones voiced his <br />belief the area is riparian. <br /> <br />Sisk asked Jones for his background, which establishes him as an expert. Jones stated he <br />has a Masters in Political Science, and a degree in Natural Resource Policy and <br />Administration and is employed by the City of Boulder as an environmental planner. <br /> <br />Sisk asked Robson for his background, which establishes him as an expert. Robson <br />stated he is in Environmental Planning, with a degree in Environmental Science from the <br />University of Colorado. He explained he and Matt Jones have very similar jobs, but have <br />a difference of opinion on the interpretation of this particular area. <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br /> <br />