Laserfiche WebLink
February 13th - 9:00 a.m. Review of draft by <br />the Study Committee <br />February 20th - 7/7:30 p.m. Public Hearing and <br />PRC presentation of report to <br />t:he public (invitations are <br />forthcoming from PRC.) <br />February 27th - 9:00 a.m. Review and summary of <br />Public Hearing and comments. <br />The final Report will be completed by March 1985 <br />for distribution. <br />Council expressed concerns with receiving <br />information in time to analyze the results as <br />there has been an abundant amount of time and <br />money expended in participating in the study. The <br />time period that Council has to react on this <br />study is insuff_Lcient and the public also would <br />have little timE~ to digest the information and <br />react at the Publ_Lc Hearing. <br />Rupp suggested that at the February 20th meeting, <br />they continue the Public Hearing date to review <br />findings. <br />Mayor Meier moved that the Public Hearing set for <br />February 20, 1985,, for the U.S. 36 Study be either <br />continued or po;;tponed if information is not <br />received by Council and the public in time for <br />assessment prior t:o the hearing. Leary seconded, <br />and the motion was passed unanimously. <br />Fauson asked that: the Planning Commission respond <br />giving their evaluation of the proposal if they <br />receive information by their February 12, 1985, <br />regular meeting. <br />BROOMFIELD ANNEXATION Hundley met with the Broomfield planning <br />consultant charged with developing the Master Plan <br />update for they annexed territory south of <br />Louisville. Hundley also met with Broomfield City <br />Manager, George DeCiero, who suggested that as <br />soon as the draft: comprehensive plan update for <br />this area is complete the respective City Council <br />members could meet and discuss the issues related <br />to this annexation.. <br />WATER TREATMENT <br />PLANT IMPROVEMENTS Hundley related to Council some problems with the <br />work at the facility that have now been identified <br />and are being corrected by the contractor. A <br />warranty has been requested from the contractor to <br />guarantee that the remedial measures being taken <br />6 <br />