Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />Apnl 19, 2016 <br />Page 11 of 17 <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Council member Maloney asked about a Planning Commission question concerning <br />pedestrian access The answer was Planning Commission felt satisfied it was not an <br />issue. <br />Council member Keany asked about lighting and impact on residents across the street. <br />APPLICANT PRESENTATION <br />Mike Miranda, 2919 W. 39th Avenue, Denver, CO on behalf of the design development <br />team reported on the project goals. He felt the area was a great example of a mixed <br />use development. There is residential, retail, and already office development This is a <br />great location for this speculative office development. He showed the plan and pointed <br />out substantial landscaping and the safe pedestrian access for the visitors and workers <br />of the building The design tries to work with the site, not against it. From the <br />residential side, it will appear as a one story development. There are plans to have <br />outside plaza areas that could be used for outdoor work The lighting would be for <br />security with some lighting along Centennial with no up -wash lighting. Dark sky <br />requirements will be met. <br />COUNCIL QUESTION <br />Mayor Muckle asked if the parking lot would connect to the adjacent development. The <br />answer was no. Mayor Muckle asked about drainage issues. Planner Robinson felt this <br />development should actually help with drainage issues in the area. <br />Jeff Sheets, Koelbel and Company, 5291 E. Yale Avenue, Denver, CO remarked on the <br />slope of the site and working with it. Both floors will act as offices. The connectivity to <br />the retail is important. The roadway will allow for traffic to come in two ways <br />PUBLIC COMMENT <br />Larry Boven,1108 Hillside Lane, Louisville, CO stated he lives directly across from the <br />development. He was positive about the pedestrian walkway and the lower elevation of <br />the side of the building facing residential. He was concerned about the impact of the <br />lighting and the exit and entrance on east the side directly across from Hillside Lane. He <br />wanted to protect the safety of families in the area and asked for consideration of only <br />one entrance on the west side. Putting a private drive on McCaslin may cause traffic <br />issues <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br />Council member Stolzmann thought the developer used the site well and met the design <br />standards The access for pedestrians needs to be a requirement. <br />