Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 19, 2016 <br />Page 5 of 17 <br />Council member Stolzmann thought what was agreed upon was Community <br />Commercial (CC) and Commercial Business (CB) would not allow residential. SRU is <br />not taken away, but residential uses in those zone districts would not be compatible <br />Other SRU's could be used in other instances. <br />Council member Leh agreed Council member Loo thought the difficulty would be the <br />redevelopment of those zone districts if they already contain residential <br />Planner Robinson said this was where direction was needed. Should currently allowed <br />residential be allowed with redevelopment <br />Council member Loo was concerned if there was no SRU across the board, current <br />uses could not be allowed with redevelopment. <br />Mayor Muckle proposed trusting staff to bring back legislation to generally preclude <br />residential as a possible use by special review in these zone districts and address <br />grandfathering of present uses <br />Mayor Muckle asked for discussion on heights <br />Council member Maloney asked about the Regal area on the map in the packet. He <br />was concerned about the height allowances near the adjacent homes and wanted to <br />protect the property owners from being in the shadow of commercial buildings. <br />Planner Robinson noted the recommendation from the last meeting was to put in a <br />residential transition standard, which is currently in the mixed use zoning, which says <br />within a certain distance of existing residential the maximum height is limited Those <br />heights would be fleshed out with the design guidelines. The plan now calls for <br />additional buffers against existing residential but is not represented on the map but in <br />the text of the document <br />Council member Stolzmann wanted the text developed for the guidelines also be shown <br />clearly in the graphic. <br />Council member Leh asked about the Main Street crossing and underpasses. He <br />addressed the text concerning the new note directing staff to continuously evaluate the <br />area need for an underpass He requested the underpass be included as part of the <br />South Boulder Road traffic improvements and recommended the public improvements <br />chart include the underpass at Main Street and South Boulder Road. <br />Mayor Muckle supported the idea of exploring an underpass near Main Street. He <br />noted it would be expensive and has to be done with an engineering point of view, with <br />some flexibility and support of staff language to improve the crossing in the meantime. <br />