Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 19, 2016 <br />Page 7 of 17 <br />Council member Stolzmann asked for Council member Leh's proposed year range for <br />this project Council member Leh felt it should be in the 6 -10 year range. <br />Council member Loo asked if there was money in the budget for at grade <br />improvements Planner Robinson responded yes, in the 6 -10 year range <br />Mayor Muckle expressed a desire to see open space buffer property in the purchase <br />plans. He would like to see language about the Seventh Day Adventist Church property <br />added to what was in the plan for the Santdlli property; evaluate the possibility of <br />acquisition. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton did not want to require property owners to sell but suggested this <br />may be an opportunity to partner with Lafayette to provide the buffer. He did not want to <br />necessarily see it be at the top of the list, but agreed it should be on the map for future <br />evaluation. <br />Council member Stolzmann addressed the intersection of two way traffic into North <br />Main apartments. She asked the plan read it becomes two -way traffic when the <br />property to the east is redeveloped. The driveways combine to create one, two way <br />driveway. <br />Planner Robinson was asked if combining those driveways was possible He answered <br />yes, language could be in the plan to address combining those driveways if there were <br />a redevelopment. <br />Council member Leh addressed an email received which corrected depiction of a trail or <br />sidewalk that does not exist He asked it be corrected if needed. He supported the <br />suggestion there should be a connection between Village Shopping Center and the trail. <br />Council member Keany arrives 815 PM <br />Council member Maloney asked if those connections were reasonable. Planner <br />Robinson commented the connection to the shopping center could be added He noted <br />if there was a wish for a sidewalk along Centennial when and if the properties on the <br />east side redevelop, that would be a fine idea. The trail noted as not existing is a <br />dedicated bike lane on Steel Street and therefore included as a connection. <br />Council member Stolzmann asked about South Boulder Road and Kaylix. The <br />proposed signal is closer to Hwy. 42 and may create more problems by signals being <br />too close together. She did not want to push traffic into neighborhoods as they try to <br />avoid stop lights. <br />