My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2016 04 19
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2016 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2016 04 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:39 PM
Creation date
5/18/2016 10:15:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2016 04 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 19, 2016 <br />Page 7 of 17 <br />Council member Stolzmann asked for Council member Leh's proposed year range for <br />this project Council member Leh felt it should be in the 6 -10 year range. <br />Council member Loo asked if there was money in the budget for at grade <br />improvements Planner Robinson responded yes, in the 6 -10 year range <br />Mayor Muckle expressed a desire to see open space buffer property in the purchase <br />plans. He would like to see language about the Seventh Day Adventist Church property <br />added to what was in the plan for the Santdlli property; evaluate the possibility of <br />acquisition. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton did not want to require property owners to sell but suggested this <br />may be an opportunity to partner with Lafayette to provide the buffer. He did not want to <br />necessarily see it be at the top of the list, but agreed it should be on the map for future <br />evaluation. <br />Council member Stolzmann addressed the intersection of two way traffic into North <br />Main apartments. She asked the plan read it becomes two -way traffic when the <br />property to the east is redeveloped. The driveways combine to create one, two way <br />driveway. <br />Planner Robinson was asked if combining those driveways was possible He answered <br />yes, language could be in the plan to address combining those driveways if there were <br />a redevelopment. <br />Council member Leh addressed an email received which corrected depiction of a trail or <br />sidewalk that does not exist He asked it be corrected if needed. He supported the <br />suggestion there should be a connection between Village Shopping Center and the trail. <br />Council member Keany arrives 815 PM <br />Council member Maloney asked if those connections were reasonable. Planner <br />Robinson commented the connection to the shopping center could be added He noted <br />if there was a wish for a sidewalk along Centennial when and if the properties on the <br />east side redevelop, that would be a fine idea. The trail noted as not existing is a <br />dedicated bike lane on Steel Street and therefore included as a connection. <br />Council member Stolzmann asked about South Boulder Road and Kaylix. The <br />proposed signal is closer to Hwy. 42 and may create more problems by signals being <br />too close together. She did not want to push traffic into neighborhoods as they try to <br />avoid stop lights. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.