My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Summary 2016 04 26
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Study Sessions
>
2016 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Summary 2016 04 26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:55:27 AM
Creation date
6/1/2016 9:42:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Supplemental fields
Test
SSSUM 2016 04 26
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Study Session Summary <br />April 26, 2016 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />Members stated they will be asking the Council for official feedback on the action <br />plan later this year. They also asked the Council to consider a noise ordinance, a <br />2nd community garden site, and support for a sustainability coordinator position. <br />Stolzmann stated she was very excited about the action plan and its goals. She <br />asked the board to help with sustainability on the proposed rec center expansion. <br />Maloney thanked the board for their service. He asked if there is any interest in <br />doing green residence awards as well as the green businesses awards. <br />Keany noted the board is working on updating the website and gave a big thanks <br />to Public Works and Parks for their work on the community gardens. <br />Muckle thanked them for work on the action plan and he looks forward to further <br />discussion on it. <br />Loo stated her concern about the plan is that it may not align with economic <br />realities such as bag fees and LEED platinum status. She wants more buy -in <br />from the business community and more definitions and understanding of what it <br />will really take. She doesn't want the Council to adopt a plan that raises <br />expectations beyond what the City can realistically accomplish. <br />Leh asked if the board has any lessons learned from the garden project. Heaney <br />said they have quite a few that will help with the next one. <br />Heaney noted there is still interest in a noise ordinance and she has a draft if the <br />Council is interested. <br />Lipton asked if there is still any "low hanging fruit" for sustainability projects in <br />City buildings. Szabados noted the proposed rec center is good place for <br />changes, but existing buildings are harder to retrofit. <br />Keany noted the board sent a letter to all of Council asking the Council to <br />consider sustainability when reviewing the 5 -year CIP plan. <br />Library Board of Trustees Annual Report <br />Members of the board in attendance: <br />Sherri Lancton <br />Debra Williams, Superior Representative <br />Lancton gave the board's update noting the Library staff's work this year included <br />the new web site, STEM programs, the new makerspace, science programs, <br />improved coordination with BVSD, and improved efficiency. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.