Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville, Colorado • Louisville Recreation Center Tax Survey • 2016 <br />Summary <br />• The City of Louisville contracted with National Research Center, Inc. (NRC) to develop <br />and administer a topical survey to measure citizen opinions about possible tax questions <br />for the 2016 ballot related to the expansion of the Recreation and Senior Center and <br />Aquatics Facilities. <br />• The Louisville Recreation Center Tax Survey was administered by phone using an <br />eligible registered voters list obtained from the County of Boulder Elections Office. <br />• A total of 400 surveys were completed, with a response rate of 8 %. <br />• The margin of error is plus or minus five percentage points around any given percentage <br />point for the entire sample. <br />Residents of Louisville think highly of their City government's performance. <br />• About 8 in 10 residents awarded high marks to Louisville's government performance, <br />including the overall direction of the City, overall confidence in City government and <br />City government acting in the best interest of the community. <br />• Residents who had lived in Louisville 16 years or longer tended to give lower marks to <br />some aspects of government performance, including the overall direction of the City, <br />overall confidence in government and the government acting in the best interest of the <br />community than respondents who had lived in the community a shorter time. <br />• Residents who awarded high marks to all aspects of government performance were also <br />more likely to report they would vote in favor of a property /sales tax combination or two <br />property taxes to support the recreation center than those who did not view government <br />performance as favorably. These residents with a high- regard for Louisville government <br />were also more supportive of the extension of the historical preservation tax. <br />A majority of voters would vote for an expansion for the Recreation Center and <br />were influenced by the possible amenities that would be included and the <br />expiration of the Library Bond tax. <br />• Overall, when asked whether they would vote to increase their property taxes to finance <br />a 25 -year bond for the expansion of the Recreation and Senior Center and to improve <br />Memory Square Pool, 74% of voters said they would be willing to pay at least 5110 a year. <br />By comparison, l5% would vote "no" to any tax increase to fund the Recreation and <br />Senior Center and Memory Square Pool improvements, while 10% would vote "yes" to <br />amounts between $1 and $100. Of those willing to pay at least $110 per year, 69% would <br />pay at least $125 or and 57% would pay $150 a year. <br />• Voter segments more likely to vote for a property tax increase to finance the 25 -year <br />bond to expand the Recreation and Senior Center included voters who had lived in <br />Louisville 5 years or less, voters who did not have household members over the age of 65, <br />5 <br />Prepared by National Research Center, Inc. <br />