My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Recreation/Senior Center and Aquatic Center Expansion Task Force Agenda and Packet 2016 06 29
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
RECREATION/SENIOR/AQUATIC CENTER EXPANSION TASK FORCE
>
2016 Recreation/Senior Center and Aquatic Center Expansion Task Force Agendas and Packets
>
Recreation/Senior Center and Aquatic Center Expansion Task Force Agenda and Packet 2016 06 29
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:07:15 AM
Creation date
7/5/2016 9:13:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
RSACETFPKT 2016 06 29
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Task Force <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> June 15th, 2016 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> Council will continue to support the CIP as currently, with funds from the general <br /> fund ($125,000). The amount of$500,000 each will be funded with sales tax and <br /> be proposed to City Council to determine additional details. <br /> VII. Telephone Poll and Citizen Survey Results —The phone survey reached 400 <br /> registered voters, and provides another set of data points to consider. Results <br /> were generally favorable. Detailed results were included in the packet provided <br /> for the June 15th Task Force meeting. <br /> Maxine Most was present to voice her concern that a stand alone outdoor pool <br /> was not in the overall project design. The Task Force felt the public input <br /> process was thorough and valid when determining what amenities would be <br /> included in the conceptual designs presented. <br /> VIII. Refined Floor Plans and Cost Estimate — Sink Combs Dethlefs <br /> The shift in parking lots was discussed. There was not a cost savings by moving <br /> parking to the west, and there was concern that doing so would take out a <br /> current recreation amenity. <br /> Chris Kastelic gave an update on the LSAB meeting. They questioned how do <br /> you set up a budget without first having a list of sustainable items and solutions. <br /> He discussed solar lease options and buy back programs. <br /> Conceptual design plans were altered to include direct senior center access, <br /> partition walls, consult room was added, adjusted orientation of restrooms <br /> downstairs, patio off pool was redesigned, track will remain with the current <br /> layout with possible piece added to allow direct access to cardio area and <br /> restrooms, cardo stations will increase from 31 to 65. <br /> For Memory Square, the shell of the building will stay and modifications to the <br /> inside and outside will be made. A family changing room will be added to the <br /> north, and an exterior renderings will help visualize the look of the facilities shell. <br /> The cost of the full project now is at $28,153,309 and includes the recreation <br /> center and Memory Square. Project management fee was reduced to $392,965 <br /> (2%). <br /> The dive well was discussed and SCD presented 4 options. The 4th option was <br /> supported by the Task Force, which was the recreational option and would allow <br /> for recreation diving in aquatics area. It was suggested to explore the option of <br /> adding a climb wall to Memory Square's pool. <br /> A proposed construction plan was given by SCD. Staff will work to determine <br /> lost revenue based on the closure of areas in the facility. Sales tax would start <br /> right away, and funds streaming in could help cover the loss during construction. <br /> Michael Menaker raised the question of what if$28 million isn't enough with <br /> rising construction cost possibilities. Michele VanPelt said we would build what <br /> was proposed to the voters. Councilman Lipton said City Council could make <br /> corrections if that occurred, and he hopes to fast track the project to avoid the <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.