Laserfiche WebLink
Mayer didn't like the way the Animal Control and other questions were worded. He wanted the <br />survey looked at again in terms of the statistical implications of the random sample. <br /> <br />Keany was disappointed with the response rate and he would be reluctant to spend money again on <br />this type of survey. <br /> <br />ORDINANCE NO. 1157, SERIES 1994 - PROVIDING FOR THE EXTENSION OF THE <br />CITY'S USE TAX TO THE USE OR CONSUMPTION OF RESIDENTIAL <br />CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS PURCHASED AT RETAIL, FOR <br />PURPOSES OF FURTHERING THE ACQUISmON, IMPROVEMENT, OR EXPANSION <br />OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES OF THE BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT RE- <br />2 SERVING THE CITIZENS OF LOUISVILLE AND THEIR SCHOOL-AGE CHIIJDREN, <br />AND FOR PURPOSES OF THE ACOUISITION OF LAND IN AND AROUND THE CITY <br />FOR OPEN SPACE BUFFER ZONES. TRAILS, WILDLIFE HABITATS, WETLANDS, <br />PRESERVATION AND FUTURE PARKS; AND PROVIDING FOR THE SUBMISSION OF <br />THE ORDINANCE TO A VOTE OF THE REGISTERED ELECTORS AT A SPECIAL <br />ELECTION CALLED FOR NOVEMBER 8, 1994 - 2ND READING - PUBLIC HEARING <br />(PUBL. LSVL. TIMES - 7/9/94) <br /> <br />Tanoue read by title only Ordinance No. 1157, Series 1994, "An ordinance providing for the <br />extension of the city's Use Tax to the use or consumption of residential construction and building <br />materials purchased at retail, for purposes of furthering the acquisition, improvement, or expansion <br />of education facilities of the Boulder Valley School District RE-2 serving the citizens of Louisville <br />and their school-age children, and for purposes of the acquisition of land in and around the city for <br />open space buffer zones, trails, wildlife habitats, wetlands preservation, and future parks; and <br />providing for the submission of the ordinance to a vote of the registered electors at a special election <br />called for November 8, 1994." <br /> <br />Tami Tanoue, acting City Attorney, stated that there are a number of second reading amendments <br />proposed (shown in bold faced, underlined type in Council's packet copy), such as addressing the <br />Douglas County decision recently issued and to clarify the earmarking of the Use Tax revenues. A <br />copy of this ordinance was fumished to Sherman & Howard for their review, particularly of the title <br />as against Amendment 1 issues. They had not yet heard from Sherman & Howard. <br /> <br />Davidson opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak on Ordinance No. 1157. <br /> <br />NONE <br /> <br />Davidson closed the public heating and called for Council comments and questions. <br /> <br />Mayer wanted a sunset provision often years put into the ordinance. <br /> <br />Lathrop agreed with Mayer. <br /> <br /> <br />