My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2016 08 09 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2016 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2016 08 09 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:39 PM
Creation date
9/7/2016 8:21:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2016 08 09 SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 9, 2016 <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />Councilmember Loo stated impact fees are' payments from developers to pay for <br />needed increases in services. She stated she thought many of the items listed as <br />impact fee eligible don't seem eligible to her. City Manager Fleming stated those are <br />items he feels qualify, but if there are items Councilmembers want to not pay for with <br />impact fees, that can be changed. <br />Members discussed how impact fees are generated and what that funding may or may <br />not be spent on. The funds are collected from developers and the City has six years to <br />spend them on growth related projects. City Manager Fleming stated the final budget <br />proposal will include a list of those projects for Council consideration that he is <br />recommending be paid for with impact fees. Councilmember Loo stated she wants only <br />items included that are clearly related to growth and increasing capacity. <br />City Manager Fleming stated tonight's proposed budget includes the direction Council <br />gave staff at the June budget. It includes at least $1.5M in the pavement booster <br />program and balances other projects around that priority and targets a $2 Million <br />reserve while incorporating an overall PCI of 75 and no street lower than 35 in the next <br />five years. <br />Councilmember Loo stated the BRaD committee is discussing parking and will likely <br />recommend Council fund the parking study. Economic Development Director DeJong <br />noted the study will.require outside help to create a strategy for parking; including <br />building, operating and maintaining it, what revenue sources might be available for <br />building and operating a parking structure, how it works with surface parking and how to <br />implement a permit program, etc. <br />Members discussed what a parking study might provide, if it could be realistically <br />implemented, or if there is support for it. Members generally agreed implementation of <br />any parking plan is going to be difficult. <br />Members agreed to move the parking study to 2018 understanding it will need to <br />happen and the Council will have to make some major decisions on this issue sooner <br />than later given the issues in downtown and citizen concerns. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked for some items to be added into the budget. She <br />asked that the library book bike be included and noted she thought impact fees could be <br />used for this as it is expanding the capacity of the library. She asked for the Dillon Road <br />quiet zone to be included when the other quiet zones are completed. She asked that <br />median renovations start sooner, but other members were content with leaving that in <br />2018 while the Parks Board prioritizes the list of work. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated the amounts listed in the proposal for paving are as low as <br />he is willing to go. He would like to see the out year numbers increased for anticipated <br />inflation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.