My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1994 08 16
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1994 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1994 08 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:38 PM
Creation date
5/25/2004 2:30:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
8/16/1994
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1994 08 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Keany moved that Council forward this to the Planning Commission with Council's comments. <br />Seconded by Lathrop. All in favor except Mayer with Sisk being absent. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION H.D. DELAWARE PROPERTIES - PARCEL H - <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT AND PRELIMINARY PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN <br /> <br />Paul Wood, Planning Director, stated that the applicant, HSG Louisville LLC, proposed seven lots <br />for the 20 acre parcel located east of McCaslin Boulevard, between Dillon and U.S. 36, for the <br />development of commercial retail, hotel, and office uses. Building coverage for Lots 1, 2, and 6 <br />range approximately 38% with the hotel sites ranging up to 80%. Wood stated that the preliminary <br />documents did not reflect important evaluation criteria that is normally associated with preliminary <br />submittals with regard to building elevations or heights, parking allocations, internal vehicle and <br />pedestrian access, landscaping detail was not adequate, and building setbacks may not be adequate <br />to address separation from U.S. 36 and McCaslin Boulevard, depending on proposed building <br />heights. The applicant had presented a set of design standards for Parcel H with standards similar to <br />Centennial Marketplace standards, but less restrictive with regard to landscape and building setbacks, <br />spacing of curb cuts, sidewalk width, tree calipers, vision clearance, and signage. Concerning the <br />PUD, he stated that it showed approximately 117,000 s.f. of potential retail, in addition to two hotel <br />pads. He stated that at this point this square footage is in conflict with the Fourth Amendment to the <br />Interchange Agreement approved in 1988 limiting the retail development in Centennial Valley to <br />326,700 s.f. He stated that there is a proposed Fifth Amendment currently being reviewed by the <br />Department of Transportation. Staff comments were that there was a concern in terms of land use <br />for Parcel H for which further clarification was needed as to whether a restaurant was to be included <br />or excluded from the maximum square footage of Centennial Valley. He felt that this much additional <br />retail would require approval of the Fifth Amendment to the Interchange Agreement. Staff did not <br />feel there was adequate information on the preliminary PUD to allow for an expedited time frame for <br />a final review. <br /> <br />Tom Phare, Public Works Director, stated that if this is referred on they will be looking closely at the <br />access on McCaslin. Public Works wanted to see arrangements for a Dahlia Street extension. He <br />suggested that all of Parcel S3, the open space between Parcel H and the Golf Course be released <br />from its restricted deed covenants regarding street construction. <br /> <br />Don Shonkwiler, H.D. Delaware Properties, 400 South McCaslin, Louisville, Colorado, introduced <br />applicants Lester Shor and Steve Gettleman, architect/planner George Smith, and traffic engineer <br />Kathleen Krager of Krager Associates. He commented that the retail will require an amendment to <br />the Interchange Agreement and a Fifth Amendment to the Development Agreement. The developers <br />will be limited to no more than 20,000 s.f. of retail. He felt restaurant use was service and did not <br />fall under the definition of retail and should not be included within that 20,000 s.f. cap. Shonkwiler <br />reviewed the site plans and building elevations. He proposed constructing, at their expense, an <br />extension of Dahlia Street south of Dillon Road to Dick Biella's property. He stated that they would <br />be happy to work on any release of the reverter for this property for the construction of the public <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.