Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 11, 2016 <br />Page 8 of 18 <br />allows any more possibility of more kids with more development, I urge that it be taken out. The <br />community really expressed to CC and through the public means that we don't want any more <br />density. If there is any slight inkling of it in this plan, I'd like it taken out. I love the conceptual <br />idea of smaller stores and smaller parking lots, but many of us have to leave Louisville to shop <br />in big box stores. The possibility of having big box stores such as Hobby Lobby or ARC leave <br />and not be replaced might cause the City to lose good tax revenue. How can little stores pull in <br />the same sales tax? <br />Moline says that his children went to Coal Creek Elementary when there were many portables, <br />and they had a fine, really good experience. I don't know that portables necessarily mean a real <br />decline in education here in Louisville. <br />Bradley says portables themselves are not necessarily a horrific thing. It is the whole size of the <br />school. Having a school over 600 kids puts a strain on the whole entire system. It is the size of <br />the hallways, the cafeteria size, and the poor art teacher who has 600 kids that come through <br />her class currently. There have been national studies that the best size of an elementary school <br />is around 400 kids. Below that or above that, you have impacts on test scores. A huge <br />elementary school impacts the kids negatively. The staff and the infrastructure are affected. <br />Moline says in other parts of the county, when schools are not meeting those enrollments, they <br />get closed and schools combine. I look at this issue and think that the school district should deal <br />with this complexity. If the school district is saying that the capacity is something you feel is far <br />in excess of what the program and what the building can support, it is a problem for the district <br />to try and solve. <br />Bradley says it is the responsibility of the City to try and evaluate the impact to the community. <br />If we know, as a city, that we have a problem with the schools in Louisville, that the current <br />drawn boundaries do not put kids in the schools equally, and we know we are running into a <br />problem for LES, the capacity should be readdressed by BVSD. They are already doing that. It <br />is a big problem and the responsibility of BVSD, but I think there is some responsibility for the <br />City itself. What the PC decides directly impacts the community whether BVSD acts or not. If <br />BVSD acts and decides LES can no longer support the number of kids attending and we need <br />to redraw the boundaries, it just impacted your community. <br />Moline says that BVSD says they can accommodate the size by ratcheting down open <br />enrollment. <br />Bradley says open enrollment has been closed. There is a big argument in the community as to <br />whether LES can accommodate 600 students. At 653 students, the defined capacity of the <br />school is based on the number of physical classrooms. It does not address how many kids are <br />flowing through the hallways. <br />Tengler says I am very sympathetic to what you suggest. I think that as much as we might like <br />to provide that sort of guidance, we cannot tell a builder downtown what type of architectural <br />design they can use. There are certain things that are out of the scope of what we are allowed <br />to effectively voice our opinion on, or make any judgement on, in this PC. <br />Bradley says I think you have a lot of power and ability to voice your opinions and suggestions. <br />BVSD can take them or leave them, but I think that as a city, we have an opportunity to request <br />and ask. I am asking the PC to look at what the impact of increased development will be in this <br />area. My son is a third grader and was at LES. He is no longer at LES because he could not <br />take the noise and eat in the cafeteria. We had to withdraw him from the school which was <br />devastating to me because we loved LES. It is a wonderful school and wonderful community. <br />Tengler says I agree, as a city we do, and as individuals we certainly have that opportunity. But <br />for the PC to effectively put a condition on approval of something and suggest that BVSD needs <br />to build a new school, it is out of our scope. <br />Randy Caranci, 441 Elk Trail, Lafayette, CO <br />I have voiced my opinion several times at different types of meetings regarding the <br />redevelopment of Highway 42 which has yet to be funded. The impact on Highway 42 continues <br />