My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 06 23
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2016 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 06 23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:10 AM
Creation date
10/14/2016 9:59:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2016 06 23
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
313
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
meet applicable zoning requirements. <br />Lot 2, at 42.5 feet wide, does not comply with criterion D, requiring a 50 foot width. <br />Neither lot complies with criterion C, as the proposed depth for lot 1 is 2.61 times the <br />proposed width and the proposed depth for lot 2 is 3.53 times the proposed width. <br />Section 16.24.010 of the LMC allows modifications from the above regulations "in cases <br />where, due to exceptional topographical conditions or other conditions peculiar to the <br />site, an unnecessary hardship would be placed on the subdivider. Such modifications <br />shall not be granted if it would be detrimental to the public good or impair the basic <br />intent and purposes of this title. Any modification granted shall be in keeping with the <br />intent of the comprehensive development plan of the city." <br />In granting the variance, the BOA found hardship, and the discussion above addressed <br />impact on public good and compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan, so staff believes <br />modifications to criteria C and D are justified. With the modification, staff believes the <br />application meets each of the seven criteria established in Section 16.16.060, including <br />the variances granted by the Board of Adjustment as criteria A. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff recommends Planning Commission approve of Resolution No. 15, Series 2016, a <br />resolution recommending approval of a replat to subdivide a single 15,000 SF lot into <br />two separate lots in the Residential Low (RL) zone district, located at 105 Roosevelt <br />Avenue, Lots 15-17 & 10 ft vacated alley, Block 4, Johnson's First Addition, with no <br />conditions. The Planning Commission may approve (with or without conditions), <br />continue, or deny the applicant's request for minor subdivision approval. <br />ATTACHMENT(S): <br />1. Resolution No. 15, Series 2016 <br />2. Application materials <br />3. Final Plat <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.