Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 18. 2016 <br />Page 10 of 14 <br />He asked what the impact on the schools would be with this plan. He suggested adding <br />an additional bike lane on McCaslin Boulevard is not needed, perhaps Centennial <br />parkway could be one lane, but not a reduction on McCaslin Boulevard. <br />Curtis Paxton, 383 Meeker Court, stated he has talked to a number of residents, and he <br />found citizens don't want Louisville to be Boulder. He doesn't think there is market <br />pressure for changing the zoning. He asked Council to consider 1) a discussion of what <br />the total population of Louisville should be 2) what is a real world vision for the area 3) <br />incorporate more of a buffer between existing communities and new areas 4) most <br />residents don't understand the difference between the Small Area Plan and Sam's Club <br />redevelopment. <br />Sonya Salki, 352 South Lark Avenue, has concerns about the impacts of this plan on <br />the existing residences in the area, noise and traffic will be a nightmare. They will <br />negatively impact the value of my home which is adjacent to the area. <br />Frost Yamell, 1109 Hillside Lane, wanted to ask council to take the good things in the <br />plan and consider closely the impact of adding residential to the areas now zoned <br />commercial. New rooftops will only spend their money in Superior. <br />Charles Hasemen, 247 South Lark Avenue, traffic on McCaslin Boulevard continues to <br />get worse and additional residents will only increase that traffic. He would like to see the <br />lane reduction. He would like Council to stop residential infill. He stated most of the Bus <br />Rapid Transit use is people going to Boulder, we need more commercial and <br />businesses in the area to attract people to spend their money here. He would like to <br />keep one story for those areas adjacent to neighborhoods. <br />Sherry Sommer, 910 South Palisade Court, agreed with earlier comments. Regarding <br />Parcel 0, she likes the existing use and doesn't want to see housing or densification <br />there, she would rather see more office and commercial in the area as a whole. <br />Chris Hagelin, 1068 Eagle Court, supports the plan for more urban and less suburban <br />land uses for its lower impact on climate change, lower emissions, and a safer bike and <br />pedestrian area. <br />Cindy Bedell, 662 West Willow Street, likes the livability aspect of the Small Area Plan <br />and traffic is a huge impact on quality of life. She doesn't want to see high density <br />development in the McCaslin Boulevard area. She doesn't see the need for more <br />residential and the loss of commercial areas. She would like to see a dark night <br />ordinance implemented. <br />Tom Ward, 1145 Hillside Court, stated his primary concern is adding residential and the <br />impact it will have on the school system. Suggests not adding anymore residential until <br />the school system can support it. He asked that a buffer be created between the Hillside <br />