My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2016 10 18
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2016 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2016 10 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:39 PM
Creation date
11/2/2016 10:27:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2016 10 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 18. 2016 <br />Page 10 of 14 <br />He asked what the impact on the schools would be with this plan. He suggested adding <br />an additional bike lane on McCaslin Boulevard is not needed, perhaps Centennial <br />parkway could be one lane, but not a reduction on McCaslin Boulevard. <br />Curtis Paxton, 383 Meeker Court, stated he has talked to a number of residents, and he <br />found citizens don't want Louisville to be Boulder. He doesn't think there is market <br />pressure for changing the zoning. He asked Council to consider 1) a discussion of what <br />the total population of Louisville should be 2) what is a real world vision for the area 3) <br />incorporate more of a buffer between existing communities and new areas 4) most <br />residents don't understand the difference between the Small Area Plan and Sam's Club <br />redevelopment. <br />Sonya Salki, 352 South Lark Avenue, has concerns about the impacts of this plan on <br />the existing residences in the area, noise and traffic will be a nightmare. They will <br />negatively impact the value of my home which is adjacent to the area. <br />Frost Yamell, 1109 Hillside Lane, wanted to ask council to take the good things in the <br />plan and consider closely the impact of adding residential to the areas now zoned <br />commercial. New rooftops will only spend their money in Superior. <br />Charles Hasemen, 247 South Lark Avenue, traffic on McCaslin Boulevard continues to <br />get worse and additional residents will only increase that traffic. He would like to see the <br />lane reduction. He would like Council to stop residential infill. He stated most of the Bus <br />Rapid Transit use is people going to Boulder, we need more commercial and <br />businesses in the area to attract people to spend their money here. He would like to <br />keep one story for those areas adjacent to neighborhoods. <br />Sherry Sommer, 910 South Palisade Court, agreed with earlier comments. Regarding <br />Parcel 0, she likes the existing use and doesn't want to see housing or densification <br />there, she would rather see more office and commercial in the area as a whole. <br />Chris Hagelin, 1068 Eagle Court, supports the plan for more urban and less suburban <br />land uses for its lower impact on climate change, lower emissions, and a safer bike and <br />pedestrian area. <br />Cindy Bedell, 662 West Willow Street, likes the livability aspect of the Small Area Plan <br />and traffic is a huge impact on quality of life. She doesn't want to see high density <br />development in the McCaslin Boulevard area. She doesn't see the need for more <br />residential and the loss of commercial areas. She would like to see a dark night <br />ordinance implemented. <br />Tom Ward, 1145 Hillside Court, stated his primary concern is adding residential and the <br />impact it will have on the school system. Suggests not adding anymore residential until <br />the school system can support it. He asked that a buffer be created between the Hillside <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.