My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1994 10 04
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1994 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1994 10 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:38 PM
Creation date
5/26/2004 10:37:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
10/4/1994
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1994 10 04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Arno Laesecke, 700 Owl Drive, Louisville, Colorado, agreed with the previous public speakers, <br />especially on the traffic, density, and over-crowding of schools. He felt the Recreation Center access <br />would create traffic hazards. He did not feel the connection to public transportation reflected reality. <br />He asked Council to deny the Special Review Use and provide for lower density. He had not visited <br />the McStain offices, but had been told by realtors that there would be single family houses on this site. <br /> <br />Margaret Romero, 786 Trail 1 Ridge Drive, Louisville, Colorado, stated that she lives directly above <br />the proposed project. She voiced the same concerns as the other neighbors. She also felt that the <br />Pine Street/Via Appia intersection is already a very difficult intersection. She had visited the McStain <br />sales office and had not seen this plan posted in their office, or signed an disclosure agreement to her <br />knowledge. <br /> <br />Bill Suitts, 460 Paragon Drive, Boulder, Colorado, stated that he is the one who named the area <br />Centennial Valley and had purchased the property being discussed (a total of 550 acres). He <br />reviewed the history of the property. He felt there had been commitments made by the City of <br />Louisville and by McStain. He stated that McStain had lived up to their commitments and he hoped <br />the city would do the same. <br /> <br />Dale M. Webel, 414 Owl Drive, Louisville, Colorado, stated that two units in her Wildfire townhome <br />complex that have been on the market, with each receiving an offer, but the people did not qualify <br />for financing, so they were taken off the market. She stated that there are units in the complex that <br />were put on the market and taken offbecause there was nobody (to purchase them). <br /> <br />John Leary, 1116 LaFarge, Louisville, Colorado, stated he was a former Councilman who had dealt <br />with this project. He was in favor of this project because the city's Comprehensive Plan calls for a <br />mix of housing and there is so little multi-family in Louisville. He felt this is an appropriate location <br />for this project. He felt this project is aesthetically pleasing and the open space is much more <br />contiguous and visually functional that it would be with single family housing. He stated that the city <br />has no obligation to alter this plan, especially when it is consistent with some of the goals that the city <br />has established. He felt McStain had been one of the more responsible builders in Louisville. <br /> <br />Kerstin Dickson, 829 Owl Drive, Louisville, Colorado, stated that she had purchased her home from <br />McStain and did not remember this plan being posted. She did remember a disclosure statement. She <br />remembered that Nancy Brubaker mentioned that this was a residential zoned area and she would not <br />have to worry about any condos or apartments being built there. <br /> <br />Elizabeth Carter, 761 Owl Court, Louisville, Colorado, was not in favor of the project. <br /> <br />Eric Hershey, 657 West Pine Street, Louisville, Colorado, wanted to see a lower density, but felt <br />McStain was trying. When he moved into the Wildfire townhomes (1986) the plan was clearly on <br />the wall. In 1989 he moved into Ridgeline and it was on the wall. He stopped by Pine Street Park <br />and it was on the wall in their sales office. He did not feel the issues being discussed here were <br />McStain's to solve alone. <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.