My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2016 11 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2016 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2016 11 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:39 PM
Creation date
11/16/2016 11:51:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2016 11 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 1, 2016 <br />Page 4 of 9 <br />Mayor Muckle asked if there was new language in the plan identifying a buffer between <br />existing commercial and residential areas. Planner Robinson stated the language has <br />not changed significantly, but the existing language addresses lowering building heights <br />and creating transition zone standards. <br />Councilmember Loo asked if a market study is in the budget or if that would need <br />additional funding. City Manager Fleming agreed this would require additional funding <br />as it is not currently in the 2017 proposed budget. <br />Councilmember Maloney asked if the changes from the last meeting would really <br />generate an additional 1,700 employees as that seems like a very high number. Planner <br />Robinson stated yes, that is the build out estimate. The Plan would create almost <br />350,000 s.f. of new space. Councilmember Maloney asked if these assumptions would <br />generate so much additional revenue, it seems very high. Director Zuccaro stated these <br />are the assumptions only, but if the area does build out it should hold true. <br />Director Zuccaro stated the fiscal model shows development potential based on the <br />zoning, but many other factors such as infrastructure, place making, and how attractive <br />the environment will are all needed to draw retail and office uses. <br />Councilmember Maloney asked if based on this information, commercial property is <br />more beneficial to the City than residential. Director Zuccaro stated that is the case <br />based on the model we are using. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated we know retail and commercial are fiscally positive to a <br />city, but we don't know if this is market tested and will actually produce robust retail. We <br />have to recognize we can't produce that many shoppers with our current population and <br />this area may not build out like this in 20 years. We have no guarantees. <br />Councilmember Loo asked if there is any interest in completing the market study. Mayor <br />Muckle stated that for him personally a market study won't change his mind right now. <br />He is however, interested in working on "first and final mile" issues in the area. <br />Councilmember Loo stated it was not clear to her what the land use vision currently is <br />for the area. Planner Robinson stated that for the current Plan there are no new <br />residential uses in the area. This is based on direction staff received from the Council at <br />the October 18 meeting. <br />Councilmember Leh stated he would like to see a market study completed to give <br />additional information to verify this plan is moving the City in the right direction, <br />particularly since we are limiting residential growth. Director Zuccaro stated for a plan <br />such as this, market studies aren't usually completed, but it might offer some additional <br />information. Councilmember Leh stated he thinks a study would be worthwhile to add <br />additional information and help understand if these land use numbers are correct. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.