My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2016 11 16
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2001-2019 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2016 11 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:03:13 PM
Creation date
12/2/2016 10:50:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BOAPKT 2016 11 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 19, 2016 <br />Page 6 of 16 <br />DeJong says can you estimate the distance between the existing trees and the new wires. Was <br />it 10' or 5'? There is a specific clearance distance derivation by the Gallet equation. There are <br />specific rules that Xcel is supposed to follow. <br />Godec says Xcel cleared a whole path around the state, not just in Louisville. They had warned <br />me two years ago that a couple of the trees needed to be cut off at the base. It didn't surprise <br />me and I was not interested in litigation. I didn't threaten Xcel that I would sue them. My <br />intention here was to do what I could do with what I thought were my rights under the law, <br />without undue burden on myself or Xcel. <br />DeJong says did you speak to Xcel about any other vegetation that could be appropriate <br />replacement. <br />Godec says I asked them about the trellis or grapevines. They said that was fine. But I know full <br />well that if something happens, and they have to service the lines, they can come through and <br />dig up the entire corridor in Louisville. They don't have to ask our permission. This seemed to <br />me to be the most expeditious and the situation that would change the least. The pergola is a <br />fixed height. Grapevines don't grow higher. I could have considered planting additional trees but <br />I wasn't interested in putting myself or any future owner of the property at risk for having this <br />happen again. <br />DeJong says under Xcel Energy's vegetation management transmission right-of-way, tree <br />clearing, and maintenance, they specifically state that we may allow compatible low -growing <br />species to remain in the right-of-way. We do attempt to work with landowners to determine if <br />trees or other vegetation deems compatible with the safe operation of the line may remain. <br />Godec says Xcel did and they made it clear that the apple trees and the ash I had in the back <br />absolutely could not stay. I didn't ask about alternative smaller trees under the assumption this <br />was the simplest and quickest way to go and solve the problem. I would not run into this issue in <br />the future if I have vines or low growing plants on a structure. <br />DeJong says from my understanding of looking at the North American Energy Specifications <br />with regard to 230 kilovolts, over 5000 to 6000 feet in elevation, there necessitates a clearance <br />of approximately 4' for vegetation; 4' from the lines. <br />Godec says in looking all the way down the neighborhood, they cut every tree underneath the <br />power lines to the ground. <br />Meseck says I know Xcel cut down most plants underneath the transmission lines down to the <br />ground that were not on private property. The lines by Fireside Elementary and out to Dillon and <br />Cherry have been cleared out. The lines cross a number of properties to the north of your <br />property where they cut trees in half. <br />Godec says I talked to the arborist and he made it clear that this was what they were going to <br />do. As I went around the neighborhood and talked to people, it did turn out that two or three of <br />the houses not far from me threatened to sue Xcel. They got lawyers and wrote something up. <br />In my opinion, they got a stay of execution. I didn't think that was the way to go and thought this <br />property should be in compliance. <br />Malmquist asks Godec to point out the power lines on the drawing. The power lines are now <br />closer to the ground, is that correct? <br />Robinson says the power lines run through the easement lines on the drawing. <br />Godec says the lines are now closer so Xcel got more aggressive in clearing underneath the <br />lines. The Xcel communication says they have been more aggressive in the right-of-ways since <br />some of the fires in the mountain areas. They were not amendable to a reasonable conversation <br />about being able to keep my trees. <br />Malmquist asks if the power lines are between your house and the pergola. <br />Godec says the power lines are on top of the pergola. In summary, it appears that criteria 1 and <br />2 need to be met. There needs to be a unique physical circumstance. My contention is that the <br />unique physical circumstance is my lack of ability to have a tree there. <br />Meseck says based on the drawings, did you have a contractor or architect design the <br />structure. <br />Godec says my roommate and I built it. We did the drawings after the fact. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.