Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 15, 2016 <br />Page 7 of 14 <br />Councilmember Maloney asked where the two additional units would fit in the building. <br />Mr. Williams noted they are being added in the south end of the building by moving <br />uses within the building. It does not change the footprint of the building. <br />Councilmember Maloney asked how the waiver requests meet the planning criteria. <br />Planner Trice noted this building will be the transition between Plaza Drive and the <br />North End subdivision and will create a buffer with the North End neighborhood. <br />Director Zuccaro added Criteria 1 and 6 speak to the relationship with the surrounding <br />area and the applicant addressed those. He added the application is creating a public <br />access to open space which provides a public benefit. <br />Mayor Muckle asked for public comment. There was no public comment. <br />Mayor Muckle asked if there is any update on moving or saving the Casino building. <br />Michael Schonbrun 10200 Niwot Road, Boulder, stated they would very much like to <br />have someone move the building to a new location. There is no practical way to <br />incorporate the building into the new plans. At this time there does not appear to be <br />anyone willing to move the building to a new site. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton moved to approve Resolution No. 64 as updated by staff to <br />include the two additional units and the recordation change requirement. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann seconded the motion. Vote was 6-0, Councilmember Keany <br />abstained. <br />ORDINANCE NO. 1729, SERIES 2016 — AN ORDINANCE RENAMING CHAPTER <br />6.12 OF THE LOUISVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE AND AMENDING SAID CHAPTER <br />6.12 TO REPEAL THE CITY'S DOG LICENSING REQUIREMENTS = 2ND READING — <br />PUBLIC HEARING (Advertised Daily Camera 11/06/16) <br />City Attorney Light read the title and noted this item was not properly noticed for second <br />reading, so if Council has changes tonight, the item can be noticed appropriately and <br />second reading continued to the December 6 meeting. <br />City Clerk Muth stated the ordinance would update the Municipal Code to remove the <br />dog licensing requirement and retitle Chapter 6.12 to be more accurate. The City <br />currently requires all dog owners to acquire a license for each dog. This was originally <br />designed to help code enforcement and police staff identify a dog should it get loose or <br />bite someone and also to assure all dogs in town had received a rabies vaccination. As <br />a practical matter, staff has found the licensing program is not particularly useful in <br />addressing these issues and recommends discontinuing the program for the following <br />reasons: <br />• The City currently licenses approximately 600 animals each year; however staff <br />believes this is a small percentage of the number of dogs in town. <br />