My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Business Retention and Development Committee Agenda and Packet 2016 12 05
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUSINESS RETENTION & DEV COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Business Retention and Development Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Business Retention and Development Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Business Retention and Development Committee Agenda and Packet 2016 12 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:09:38 PM
Creation date
12/20/2016 9:32:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BRADPKT 2016 12 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Business Retention & Development Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 7, 2016 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA: <br />City Manager Malcolm Fleming gave an update on holiday lights. The City received two <br />bids. This year we will have more lights, more locations, less cost. Lights will be turned <br />on November 18th <br />Commissioner Shelley Angell said the year the Parade of Lights and Art Walk are <br />combined. All of downtown will be lit up on December 2nd <br />Pints in the park went really well. Separation of events was helpful. Back to 2014 levels. <br />BRaD COMMITTEE RESTRUCTURING DISCUSSION: <br />In August 2016, Council had a discussion on boards and commissions. Council asked <br />for feedback on challenges of BRaD Committee. Economic Development Director Aaron <br />DeJong discussed the memo. More formalized input from the business community <br />would be helpful. <br />Chair Loo asked if BRaD functions were separate from the City how would it be funded. <br />DeJong said it would be a mix of public revenues and money from individual <br />memberships. <br />Commissioner Menaker is not troubled by the structure of BRaD. There seems to be <br />better communication between Chamber and DBA which may be a result of this board. <br />Missing component is a representative from McCaslin area. Would hate to see <br />relationships lost that have been built up as a result of this committee. BRaD has hosted <br />a number of roundtables. The issue is that the information is never heeded. We don't <br />incorporate information into plans. Council needs to heed input. Nothing will change <br />until then. Find a couple of issues or a single issue and work on that.ie: Parking. He <br />discussed issues that could be tackled. Broader, long term initiatives do not get traction. <br />Commissioner Angell said it is hard to give a recommendation to Council but when <br />developers come to BRaD, they are already getting response from Council on <br />committee. Perhaps restructure to where we look at business needs. <br />Council member Maloney said the goals and responsibilities need to be defined. Once <br />we understand those, we will know how to structure. What are we asking this group to <br />do? <br />Commissioner Angell said she thought BRaD is supposed to give recommendations to <br />Council. We talk but we do not move forward to Council. <br />Regarding the downtown parking issue, Council member Maloney said we have added <br />parking at DELO, Blue Parrot parking 107 spaces have been added. Council has not <br />ignored it. There is progress. Council acknowledges it is still a problem. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.