Laserfiche WebLink
Business Retention & Development Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 7, 2016 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />Council member Lipton agrees with Council member Maloney. Is this the right <br />mechanism to get it done? This group was formed during the last economic crisis. <br />Things have changed. We don't have the emergency — this committee does not have <br />the proper structure to look at issues challenging us in the next 10 years. This group is <br />very downtown and CTC focused. Centennial Valley needs attention. Agendas here <br />can be very self-serving and don't represent views of community. Broad community has <br />other views. The things Council has accomplished, investment in downtown, investment <br />in the McCaslin Interchange, connectivity, urban renewal authority, roads, water lines, <br />residences, golf course, underpass seems to get lost. Developers have not come to this <br />meeting. No one from business community has come. Council needs to look at what we <br />need to do for the whole community. We are getting views that have outlived their <br />usefulness. He advocated disbanding and regrouping. <br />Commissioner Pritchard said the DBA and Chamber need to step up. McCaslin needs <br />to advocate for themselves. Business associations for downtown need to step up. BRaD <br />has outlived its usefulness. Businesses can go to the Economic Development Director <br />for advocacy. Disband and let groups step up. DeJong can do retention visits. <br />Mike Kranzdorf said an independent third party is a better way to present to Council. <br />These meetings have no influence on Council. He comes because he learns but not <br />because he influences Council. If you want to hear from business community, fund it <br />and see if it takes off. <br />Randy Caranci said developers have no influence. He fears Louisville will be a bedroom <br />community. We are losing small retail. Restaurants cannot be our only source of <br />revenue. It is cheaper and easier to do business in Lafayette. <br />Commissioner Menaker said we were set up to solve business issues and we failed. <br />Business assistance packages for Waterloo and Empire and patios came out of this <br />group and had a real effect. Communities around us are moving forward and we are <br />not. <br />Council member Maloney said he concerned that saying we are getting rid of BRaD <br />sends a bad message. We need to say what we are going to do to meet goals. The <br />goals are good. We should come up with a proposal before we disband. We want to <br />send a message to the business community that we are interested in business and it is <br />important. <br />Commissioner Angell likes the idea of the group being an advocate for business. What <br />kind of structure would this be? DeJong said it would be along the lines of setting up 3rd <br />party business organization. i.e."Louisville Economic Development Corporation". <br />City Manager Fleming agrees with Council member Maloney that abolishing BraD with <br />no other organization in place sends a bad message. BRaD was created as a venue <br />where businesses can make themselves heard. It was an attempt to reach out and <br />