Laserfiche WebLink
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 6, 2016 <br />Page 4 of 15 <br />the large medians. A one -lane Centennial Parkway would serve the area well now and <br />at build out. <br />Mr. Sheets stated the types of buildings encouraged in the Small Area Plan don't lend <br />themselves to getting the types of tenants (tech companies) we are hoping to get. He <br />added Koelbel is willing to pay for the difference between regular paving and the <br />addition of these amenities and the reconfiguration. <br />Mayor Muckle asked if we are likely to see this area build out in 20 years. Mr. Sheets <br />stated no, the current layout doesn't promote the types of uses people want and what <br />developers are currently looking to build. Koelbel would like to develop office uses in the <br />area, but there are parcels on the north side adjacent to existing residential that would <br />be great for residential development and other parcels that might be good for a <br />corporate campus of some kind as well as other office uses. <br />Mr. Sheets added he would like the City to update the design guidelines in the area to <br />address heights and setbacks. <br />Mayor Muckle asked if the lane reduction would still serve the area at build out. Chris <br />Hopkins, traffic engineer, Kimley Horn, stated their analysis of the lane reduction shows <br />it still offers plenty of capacity for projected traffic volumes at build out. <br />Public Comment <br />Chris Haglin, 1068 Eagle Court, stated he has reservations about the Plan, specifically <br />the lack of transit oriented development adjacent to the Bus Rapid Transit along US 36. <br />The area needs first and final mile solutions and pedestrian access. A second issue is <br />housing. If the City is going to have housing anywhere in town it should be next to the <br />Bus Rapid Transit. This creates fewer vehicle trips and a greater use of the bus system. <br />It also won't impact schools greatly as it will be designed for singles and couples, not <br />families. Without including these items the only thing this Plan generates is traffic. <br />Council needs to look at the long term value of housing at the Transit -Oriented <br />Development/Bus Rapid Transit areas. <br />Sid Vinall, 544 Leader Circle, stated this has been a long process and it will be positive. <br />The McCaslin Boulevard area is the major retail area for the City and we hope this plan <br />will bring more businesses. The increased population growth and traffic is not going <br />away but Louisville has been able to control growth better than some of our neighbors <br />and keep our small town character. He supports the Plan as presented. <br />Audrey Debarros, 839 West Mulberry Street, stated she would like to see a vibrant, <br />mixed use, pedestrian -friendly area but it is clear the community is not ready for multi- <br />modal efforts and creativity in design. Land use decisions are being overrun by the <br />fiscal model. The fiscal model is important but should not be the only consideration. She <br />