Laserfiche WebLink
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 19, 2016 <br />Page2of6 <br />1950 Assessor's card states "old house 1/2, new house '/z' <br />1950-1956 <br />o Partially enclosed front porch with small center gable <br />o Rear, 1.5 story, hipped -roof addition <br />o Enclosed rear patio <br />o One bay garage on northwest corner of structure <br />1956-1981 <br />o Porches constructed off of enclosed patio and rear addition <br />o Carport added on north elevation <br />1981-2016 <br />o Structure reclad in vinyl siding <br />o Detailing in gable ends removed <br />o Porch railing and supports replaced <br />o Possible replacement of window awnings <br />o Addition of swamp cooler on roof <br />o Large, gable -roofed garage along alley <br />Architectural Integrity <br />Minimal amount <br />Historic Structure Assessment would be bene <br />Research could make the case for rehabilitation <br />Social Significance - Exemplifies cultural, political, econo <br />community. <br />The property is associated with th <br />613 Grant Avenue. Members of thi <br />social heritage of the <br />Staff Recommendations: <br />Staff recommends finding there is probable cause to believe the building may be eligible for <br />landmarking making the property eligible for up to $900 for the cost of a historic structure <br />assessment. HPC may, by motion, approve or deny the finding of probable cause. <br />who lived at 625 Grant Avenue and <br />ily worked in Louisville area mines. <br />Commission �►. - '�;r, of Staff: None. <br />Applicant Presentation. <br />Heidi Trieblhorn, 625 G ven uisville, CO <br />I have lived in this house si 1999 d have a 26 year background as a residential <br />construction manager. I havent a lot of time trying to understand what parts and pieces <br />were added. There have been many remodels. I am not sure what time period we are trying to <br />see. What is interesting about this structure is that the remodels are old and unique. There is <br />some significance, not necessarily in the original structure but the original remodels. <br />Commission Questions of Applicant: None. <br />Public Comment in Favor: None. <br />Public Comment Against: None. <br />Closed Public Hearing and Discussion by Commission: <br />Haley says this home has changed a lot. The question is do we think there are enough ways to <br />take it back and make it more architecturally. <br />