Laserfiche WebLink
both parties." <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />I would prefer to have the City <br />Attorney come back next week and <br />review it. <br /> <br />Davidson: <br /> <br />I took the precaution of notifying <br />staff that I was going to do this <br />and the City Attorney has changed <br />it. <br /> <br />Griffiths: <br /> <br />It would be our recommendation, if <br />you wish to make a change consistent <br />with that suggested by the Mayor, <br />that the language of paragraph six <br />be rewritten to read as follows: <br />"This Agreement may be terminated, <br />at any time, without cause, by <br />either party, upon written notice to <br />the other. Upon termination, the <br />City shall pay the inspector only <br />for those services which have been <br />satisfactorily provided at the day <br />of termination." <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />Howard: <br /> <br />Perhaps, we should put in a 30 day <br />clause in terms of saying that we <br />would give written notice. If the <br />sub-contractor is going to terminate <br />the agreement, we would like 30 days <br />notice so we can find a replacement. <br /> <br />If we are requesting a 30 day notice <br />because we wish to drop a <br />contractor, what's the probability <br />that the contractor is going to <br />continue to do the job in the manner <br />that the City wants it done? If <br />they know that they are being, <br />essentially, fired, that leaves us <br />open to re-inspect already inspected <br />items because of a disgruntled <br />contractor. You don't terminate <br />someone without there being some ill <br />feeling. <br /> <br />Davidson: <br /> <br />John, in the past we've had no <br />contract? <br /> <br />Franklin stated that we've had prior contracts. He said that they, <br />unfortunately, weren't as broad or as timely. <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br /> <br />