My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1992 02 18
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1992 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1992 02 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:34 PM
Creation date
7/28/2005 11:12:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
2/18/1992
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1992 02 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
allow continuation of the two units on the property, five acres <br />total, and the upgrade of the mobile home, which we would regulate <br />under our construction codes. Planning Commission did review the <br />annexation request and did recommend approval of the annexation and <br />the rural residential zoning. This resolution initiates the <br />action, the two subsequent ordinances initiate the annexation and <br />the zoning. Council will get these back on April 7, 1992 for <br />public hearing. <br /> <br />Davidson called for Council comments or questions. <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />My understanding of the Louisville <br />Code, "R" zoning would allow lots of <br />up to 20,000 sq. ft., which would <br />allow 10 to 11 residential lots on <br />the property. Most of the area <br />around there is slated for <br />industrial. Council could go with <br />an Agricultural zoning with a <br />special waiver for the mobile home. <br /> <br />Franklin: <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />As presented, the Rural Residential <br />was the most direct line to the two <br />homes in question. The Agricultural <br />is a single family home on five <br />acres, which would require special <br />dispensation for the mobile home. <br />We took the most direct path which <br />would not require industrial zoning. <br /> <br />The County denied the permit on the <br />mobile home. What was the basis for <br />that? <br /> <br />Franklin: <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />Not enough land per their standards <br />to support two single family homes. <br /> <br />If the application is approved, the <br />applicants are not requesting water <br />or sewer service. Is that correct? <br />Are you satisfied that they have <br />adequate water and sewer, if in fact <br />the County has denied that request? <br /> <br />Franklin: <br /> <br />Yes. In checking with the County, <br />it was denied strictly on the basis <br />of acreage. <br /> <br />Hornbostel: <br /> <br />If we did have to provide them <br />water, is there something close, so <br />it wouldn't be a problem? <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.