My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1992 03 04
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1992 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1992 03 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:34 PM
Creation date
7/28/2005 11:22:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
3/4/1992
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1992 03 04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Davidson called for any more questions or comments from Council. <br /> <br />NONE <br /> <br />Davidson called for any questions or comments from the audience. <br /> <br />NONE <br /> <br />Davidson called for anyone present who wished to present testimony <br />on the application. <br /> <br />Weishaupl: <br /> <br />Yes, we have three residents of the <br />community. <br /> <br />Adeline Griffin, 1373 Caledonia Circle, Louisville, CO, spoke in <br />favor of the King Soopers 3.2% beer license. <br /> <br />Jan Bowman, 356 Monarch, Louisville, CO, spoke in favor of the King <br />Soopers 3.2% beer license. <br /> <br />Paul Hinkle, 1109 Harper Street, Louisville, CO, spoke, as a <br />business owner in Louisville, in favor of the King Soopers 3.2% <br />beer license. <br /> <br />Max Scott, P.O. Box 2302, Boulder, CO, owner of Edipus, Inc., a <br />survey firm doing work on 3.2% and liquor license applications, <br />explained the detail of the surveying of the neighborhoods. He <br />felt there was a real need and desire for an additional 3.2% beer <br />license in Louisville. <br /> <br />Lathrop: <br /> <br />I noticed that there was not one <br />response from a business in this <br />survey. Why is that? <br /> <br />Scott: <br /> <br />The survey was contracted to be done <br />on the weekend. We would have <br />talked to people who own businesses <br />in Louisville by going to their <br />residences. We didn't go to any <br />businesses specifically. <br /> <br />Lathrop: <br /> <br />If you're going to be doing any more <br />liquor license surveying in this <br />town, it would be advisable to <br />include the businesses. <br /> <br />Howard: <br /> <br />Susan, in your opinion, <br />application in order? <br /> <br />is this <br /> <br />Griffiths: <br /> <br />I did review the application in <br />detail and made a number of <br />suggestions for revisions and, to my <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.