Laserfiche WebLink
the Resolution is to establish a <br />Public Hearing for June 2, 1992. <br />The decision of whether or not to <br />annex the property would still be an <br />open question to be decided at a <br />later time. <br /> <br />Davidson asked that the record show that Councilman Sisk arrived. <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />I think Council needs to take a hard <br />look at the current land <br />dedications, especially with respect <br />to residential. Council needs to <br />make sure that Louisville is getting <br />sufficient land dedications to meet <br />the needs for parks and schools that <br />the residential development <br />requires. As long as this doesn't <br />preclude Council from changing <br />current annexation procedures, I <br />wouldn't be opposed to putting this <br />out for a Public Hearing. With this <br />letter that Paul Wood, Planner for <br />the City of Louisville, got from the <br />Boulder Valley Schools saying they <br />have no idea where the students <br />could go. (See attached letters. <br />Mayer read one which referred to the <br />other.) <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />I think Council is being derelict in <br />their duties to continue to have a <br />growth surge in Louisville and not <br />have the needs for children and <br />residents, who will be utilizing <br />Louisville's schools, met. The <br />issue is that Louisville doesn't <br />have schools for the students that <br />are coming into the Louisville <br />community. This issue needs to be <br />addressed by Council. <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />I have a question for Mr. Fraker. <br /> <br />Jim Fraker, 28892 Road 9, Elizabeth, CO. <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />Mr. Fraker, I noticed that there was <br />no open space dedication. John <br />Franklin told me that the intention <br />of the applicant was to explore <br />"cash in lieu of". Is that correct? <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />